Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Astra

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Проверено исследовательской группой GetInfoUsПоследняя проверка: October 2026Редакционная политика
Поделиться
Related topics (4)
GoogleOpenAIlightweightflagship

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Прямое сравнение (VS)

Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Модель глубокого рассуждения

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite от Google — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 1.0M токенов и стоимостью API $0.4/1M входящих и $2/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index69 / 100
Input Token:

$0.40 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

OpenAI

GPT-6 Astra

Модель глубокого рассуждения

GPT-6 Astra от OpenAI — передовая модель искусственного интеллекта с контекстным окном 1M токенов и стоимостью API $10.0/1M входящих и $50.0/1M исходящих токенов для программирования, аналитики и автоматизации.

Intelligence Index96 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

272K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.4%

Ключевые отличия кратко

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 24.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a larger context window (1M vs 272K tokens).
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster at 240 tok/s vs 100 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Astra
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6996
Provider
GoogleOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.40 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$2.00 / 1M$50.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.35 / 1M$7.70 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
33K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
240 tok/s100 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A82.4%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
N/A80.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$1.00 / 1M

Кто лидирует в каждой категории?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
24.1x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
+140% faster generation
Context
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
1.05M tokens window

Результаты проверенных бенчмарков

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Astra
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs82.4%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs80.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

81.2%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1375ptsvs1520pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.2%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs63.8%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs54.9%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs79.8%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs93.6%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs91.2%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

240 tok/s vs100 tok/s

Задержка и скорость ответа

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite0.29s
GPT-6 Astra0.95s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite2.37s
GPT-6 Astra5.95s

Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Monthly API Bill
$2.55 / month
$0.4/1M in · $2/1M out
GPT-6 Astra Monthly API Bill
$61.50 / month
$10/1M in · $50/1M out
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite saves approximately $58.95 / month (96%) under this workload.24.1x Savings

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Lightweight efficient multimodal transformer от Google с поддержкой до 1.0M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($0.4/1M вход, $2/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Современная архитектура Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT от OpenAI с поддержкой до 1M токенов контекста
  • Оптимальная стоимость использования ($10.0/1M вход, $50.0/1M выход) и высокая скорость генерации
  • Высокие результаты в задачах написания кода, логического мышления и многоязычной обработки
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • При работе с максимальным контекстом требуется контроль расхода токенов
  • Для узкоспециализированных задач рекомендуется точная настройка системных промптов

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Astra
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.55$2.15
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
18K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
7K32K

Технические характеристики

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Astra
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-3-5-flash-litegpt-6-astra
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-072026-09
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2026June 2026
ArchitectureLightweight efficient multimodal transformerOmni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFlat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext, audio

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Astra: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 69 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster, generating 240 tokens per second compared with 100 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.35 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.29s compared with 0.95s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 272K tokens.

Вердикт

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе google, or choose GPT-6 Astra for корпоративной автоматизации, разработки по, ии-агентов и продуктовых решений на базе openai.

Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or GPT-6 Astra?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.4/1M input and $2/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or GPT-6 Astra?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Официальные источники: Google & OpenAI Official Documentation