ERNIE 5.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare ERNIE 5.0 by Baidu against Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
Выбирайте и сравнивайте любые модели
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
ERNIE 5.0
Флагманская передовая модельERNIE 5.0 от Baidu — специализированная ИИ-модель для передового корпоративного рассуждения, программирования и промышленных ИИ-систем, обеспечивающая контекстное окно 128K, скорость 70 ток/с и индекс интеллекта 90/100 (по цене $1.5/$6 за 1
$1.50 / 1M
$6.00 / 1M
128K tokens
60%
Claude Opus 5.5
Флагманская передовая модельClaude Opus 5.5 от Anthropic — специализированная ИИ-модель для передового корпоративного рассуждения, программирования и промышленных ИИ-систем, обеспечивающая контекстное окно 1M, скорость 78 ток/с и индекс интеллекта 94/100 (по цене $4/$
$4.00 / 1M
$20.00 / 1M
1M tokens
84.6%
Ключевые отличия кратко
- ERNIE 5.0 is 3.1x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
- Claude Opus 5.5 is faster at 78 tok/s vs 70 tok/s.
- Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 60.0%).
| Feature | ERNIE 5.0 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 90 | 94 |
Provider | Baidu | Anthropic |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.50 / 1M | $4.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $6.00 / 1M | $20.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.01 / 1M | $3.08 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 70 tok/s | 78 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 60% | 84.6% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 74.5% | 82.3% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.15 / 1M | $0.40 / 1M |
Кто лидирует в каждой категории?
At-a-glance decision frameworkРезультаты проверенных бенчмарков
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Задержка и скорость ответа
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Интерактивный калькулятор стоимости токенов
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
ERNIE 5.0 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Контекстное окно 128K и генерация до 16K выходных токенов за ответ (SWE-bench Verified 60% · GPQA Diamond 74.5%)
- Высокая скорость генерации 70 токенов/сек при задержке до первого токена (TTFT) всего 580 мс
- Выгодная тарификация API (по цене $1.5/$6 за 1M токенов) с поддержкой кэширования промптов и строгих JSON-схем
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Проприетарная облачная модель без возможности скачивания весов для локального запуска в закрытом контуре
- В сверхсложных научных доказательствах специализированные тяжелые модели рассуждения могут показывать большую глубину
Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Контекстное окно 1M и генерация до 128K выходных токенов за ответ (SWE-bench Verified 84.6% · GPQA Diamond 82.3%)
- Высокая скорость генерации 78 токенов/сек при задержке до первого токена (TTFT) всего 1400 мс
- Выгодная тарификация API (по цене $4/$20 за 1M токенов) с поддержкой кэширования промптов и строгих JSON-схем
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Проприетарная облачная модель без возможности скачивания весов для локального запуска в закрытом контуре
- При больших объемах трафика рекомендуется использовать кэширование промптов и Batch API для снижения затрат
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | ERNIE 5.0 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.32 | $3.85 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 25K | 68K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 9K | 42K |
Технические характеристики
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | ERNIE 5.0 | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | ernie-5-0 | claude-opus-5-5-20260901 |
| API Protocol | Baidu REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Colossus-Scale Omnimodal MoE Transformer | Extended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer |
| Parameters | 800B total (45B active MoE) | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($1.5/1M in) across full 128K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.15/1M tokens | $0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Baidu Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
ERNIE 5.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5: Быстрые ответы (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, ERNIE 5.0 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 90 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Claude Opus 5.5 is faster, generating 78 tokens per second compared with 70 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
ERNIE 5.0 is cheaper at $1.01 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
ERNIE 5.0 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.58s compared with 1.40s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Вердикт
Choose ERNIE 5.0 for оптимально для передового корпоративного рассуждения, программирования и промышленных ии-систем, корпоративных rag-пайплайнов и масштабируемых api-сервисов., or choose Claude Opus 5.5 for оптимально для передового корпоративного рассуждения, программирования и промышленных ии-систем, корпоративных rag-пайплайнов и масштабируемых api-сервисов..
Часто задаваемые вопросы (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: ERNIE 5.0 or Claude Opus 5.5?+
ERNIE 5.0 costs $1.5/1M input and $6/1M output tokens, while Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/1M input and $20/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: ERNIE 5.0 or Claude Opus 5.5?+
ERNIE 5.0 supports 128K tokens whereas Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 против Aion-Mini: Сравнение бенчмарков, цен API и скорости (2026)Сравнение
- Aion-3.0 против Gemini 3.6 Flash: Сравнение бенчмарков, цен API и скорости (2026)Сравнение
- Aion-Mini против Laguna XS 2.1: Сравнение бенчмарков, цен API и скорости (2026)Сравнение
- Aya Expanse 32B против Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Сравнение бенчмарков, цен API и скорости (2026)Сравнение
- Aya Expanse 8B против Command R+: Сравнение бенчмарков, цен API и скорости (2026)Сравнение
- Aya Expanse 8B против Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Сравнение бенчмарков, цен API и скорости (2026)Сравнение
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Официальные источники: Baidu & Anthropic Official Documentation