Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Devstral Medium

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Devstral Medium: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct da Alibaba e Devstral Medium da Mistral AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct oferece uma janela de contexto de 262.1K tokens a $0.00/$0.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Devstral Medium oferece 128K tokens de contexto a $0.80/$2.40 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct da Alibaba é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 262K, velocidade de 140 tokens/s, índice de inteligênci

Intelligence Index76 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Mistral AI

Devstral Medium

IA Agêntica e Uso de Ferramentas

O Devstral Medium da Mistral AI é um modelo de IA projetado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, oferecendo janela de contexto de 128K, velocidade de 75 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 52/100

Intelligence Index52 / 100
Input Token:

$0.80 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.40 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

51.5%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has a larger context window (262K vs 128K tokens).
  • Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is faster at 140 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructDevstral Medium
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7652
Provider
AlibabaMistral AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.80 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$2.40 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.54 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
140 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/A51.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
N/A62%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.20 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct
+87% faster generation
Context
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct
262.1K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructDevstral Medium
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs51.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs62%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

74%vs80.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1285ptsvs1330pts
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs45%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

63%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs72%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs78%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

140 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct0.28s
Devstral Medium0.50s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct3.85s
Devstral Medium7.17s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Devstral Medium Monthly API Bill
$3.66 / month
$0.8/1M in · $2.4/1M out
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct saves approximately $3.66 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 262K com limite máximo de saída de 8K tokens (MMLU-Pro 74% · Arena Elo 1285)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 140 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 280 ms
  • Pesos abertos (30B total (3B MoE)) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Devstral Medium · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 128K com limite máximo de saída de 33K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 51.5% · GPQA Diamond 62%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 75 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 500 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.8/$2.4 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructDevstral Medium
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.55
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
15K38K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K18K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructDevstral Medium
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instructdevstral-medium-latest
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIMistral AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2025-042025-07
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2025May 2025
ArchitectureCompact Sparse Mixture-of-Experts TransformerHigh-Capacity Agentic Code Transformer
Parameters30B total (3B active MoE)Confidential (~70B)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Flat rate ($0.8/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Cached input at $0.2/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Mistral AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Devstral Medium: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct or Devstral Medium?

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is more intelligent. It scores 76 compared with 52 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.54 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.28s compared with 0.50s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Devstral Medium (Indicado para fluxos de trabalho agênticos autônomos, chamada de ferramentas e automação, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct oferece geração mais rápida e Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct ou Devstral Medium?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct ou Devstral Medium?+

O Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct custa $0.00 / $0.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Devstral Medium custa $0.80 / $2.40. No custo combinado, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct suporta 262.1K tokens de contexto contra 128K tokens do Devstral Medium, enquanto Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Alibaba e Mistral AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).