Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B vs GPT-6 Astra
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B by NVIDIA against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B
오픈 웨이트 추론 모델NVIDIA의 Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B 모델은 강화학습 기반의 고효율 오픈 웨이트 사고 사슬(Chain-of-Thought) 추론에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 128K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 150 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 38/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $0.05 / 출력 $0.15)을 제공합니다.
$0.05 / 1M
$0.15 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
GPT-6 Astra
네이티브 음성 및 오디오 모델OpenAI의 GPT-6 Astra 모델은 자연스러운 음성 합성(TTS), 실시간 오디오 처리 및 고정밀 음성 인식에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 272K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 100 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 96/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $10 / 출력 $50)을 제공합니다.
$10.00 / 1M
$50.00 / 1M
272K tokens
82.4%
한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점
- Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B is 273.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 128K tokens).
- Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B is faster at 150 tok/s vs 100 tok/s.
| Feature | Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 38 | 96 |
Provider | NVIDIA | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.15 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.03 / 1M | $7.70 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 150 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 82.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 80.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.01 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
부문별 우위 모델
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 128K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 4K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (Arena Elo 1190)
- 초당 150 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 240ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
- 오픈 웨이트 아키텍처 (4B)를 통해 vLLM, SGLang, Ollama 기반 자체 GPU 서버 구축 및 파인튜닝 가능
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 비양자화 전체 정밀도로 로컬 서버에서 구동하려면 충분한 GPU VRAM 용량이 필요합니다
- 초고난도 학술 연구 및 수학 증명 과제에서는 상위 대형 추론 특화 모델이 더 깊은 분석을 제공할 수 있습니다
GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 272K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 128K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 82.4% · GPQA Diamond 80.9%)
- 초당 100 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 950ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
- 합리적인 API 요금 체계(1M 토큰당 입력 $10 / 출력 $50)와 프롬프트 캐싱, 함수 호출 및 정형화된 JSON 출력 완벽 지원
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 독점 클라우드 전용 모델로 로컬 오프라인 서버에 가중치를 다운로드하여 실행할 수 없습니다
- 대규모 프로덕션 호출 환경에서는 비용 절감을 위해 프롬프트 캐싱과 배치 API(Batch API) 활용이 권장됩니다
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.02 | $2.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 4K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 2K | 32K |
기술 사양 (Specifications)
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | nemotron-content-safety-reasoning-4b | gpt-6-astra |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2026-01 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | November 2025 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Reasoning-Augmented Safety Classifier | Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT |
| Parameters | 4B | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.05/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.01/1M tokens | Automatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Text-only completion (No GUI action loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 9 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text, audio |
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B vs GPT-6 Astra: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B is faster, generating 150 tokens per second compared with 100 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B is cheaper at $0.03 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.70 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.24s compared with 0.95s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
종합 평가
Choose Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B for 강화학습 기반의 고효율 오픈 웨이트 사고 사슬(chain-of-thought) 추론, 엔터프라이즈 rag 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 api 연동에 최적., or choose GPT-6 Astra for 자연스러운 음성 합성(tts), 실시간 오디오 처리 및 고정밀 음성 인식, 엔터프라이즈 rag 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 api 연동에 최적..
자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B or GPT-6 Astra?+
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B costs $0.05/1M input and $0.15/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B or GPT-6 Astra?+
Nemotron Content Safety Reasoning 4B supports 128K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
공식 출처: NVIDIA & OpenAI Official Documentation