Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Aya Expanse 32B by Cohere and Llama 3.2 90B Vision by Meta represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Llama 3.2 90B Vision holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Llama 3.2 90B Vision is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 128K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Aya Expanse 32B leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Cohere

Aya Expanse 32B

오픈 웨이트 모델

Cohere의 Aya Expanse 32B 모델은 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0.25/1M 토큰, 출력 $0.5/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

33.5%

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Vision

오픈 웨이트 모델

Meta의 Llama 3.2 90B Vision 모델은 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0.0/1M 토큰, 출력 $0.0/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

28.5%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Llama 3.2 90B Vision is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Aya Expanse 32B is faster at 85 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Aya Expanse 32B leads on SWE-bench coding (33.5% vs 28.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureAya Expanse 32BLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4444
Provider
CohereMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.14 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
85 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
33.5%28.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
50%48.2%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.06 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Aya Expanse 32B
+5.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 3.2 90B Vision
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Aya Expanse 32B
+13% faster generation
Context
Tied
128K tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Aya Expanse 32BLlama 3.2 90B Vision
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

33.5%vs28.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

50%vs48.2%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

73%vs73.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1265ptsvs1260pts
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

72%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

85 tok/s vs75 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Aya Expanse 32B0.44s
Llama 3.2 90B Vision0.58s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Aya Expanse 32B6.32s
Llama 3.2 90B Vision7.25s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Aya Expanse 32B Monthly API Bill
$0.92 / month
$0.25/1M in · $0.5/1M out
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Llama 3.2 90B Vision saves approximately $0.92 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Aya Expanse 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Cohere의 첨단 High-Capacity Multilingual Transformer 아키텍처와 최대 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0.25/1M, 출력 $0.5/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Llama 3.2 90B Vision · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Meta의 첨단 Multimodal Adapter-Fused GQA Transformer 아키텍처와 최대 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0.0/1M, 출력 $0.0/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricAya Expanse 32BLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.18$0.20
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
28K24K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureAya Expanse 32BLlama 3.2 90B Vision
Official API Model ID (SDK)aya-expanse-32bmeta-llama/Llama-3.2-90B-Vision
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2024-102024-09
Knowledge CutoffAugust 2024December 2023
ArchitectureHigh-Capacity Multilingual TransformerMultimodal Adapter-Fused GQA Transformer
Parameters32B90B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 128K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.06/1M tokensAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 56 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 194 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which model is faster?

Aya Expanse 32B is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 3.2 90B Vision is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.14 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Aya Expanse 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.44s compared with 0.58s.

종합 평가

Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Aya Expanse 32B if your priority is Global enterprise communications, international legal translation, and academic research. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Llama 3.2 90B Vision if your workflow prioritizes Self-hosted OCR extraction, visual document analysis, and private enterprise multimodal agents. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

How does Aya Expanse 32B compare to Llama 3.2 90B Vision in API token pricing and cost per token?+

Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens, whereas Llama 3.2 90B Vision costs $0.00 input and $0.00 output. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Vision is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.

Which model has a larger context window: Aya Expanse 32B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+

Both Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision offer an identical context window of 128K tokens (~96k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.

Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Aya Expanse 32B or Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+

Aya Expanse 32B scores 33.5% on SWE-bench Verified while Llama 3.2 90B Vision scores 28.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Aya Expanse 32B holds the verified benchmark lead.

What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+

Aya Expanse 32B is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, Llama 3.2 90B Vision focuses on standard fast inference.

How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision?+

Aya Expanse 32B generates approximately 85 tokens per second, while Llama 3.2 90B Vision delivers 75 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Aya Expanse 32B provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.

Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Aya Expanse 32B and Llama 3.2 90B Vision to optimize costs?+

Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Llama 3.2 90B Vision to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Aya Expanse 32B. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs