Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nano Banana Pro vs Nano Banana

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Nano Banana Pro vs Nano Banana: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Nano Banana Pro by Google and Nano Banana by Google represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Nano Banana holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Nano Banana is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Nano Banana Pro provides an expanded memory horizon with 66K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Nano Banana leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Google

Nano Banana Pro

심층 추론 모델

Google의 Nano Banana Pro 모델은 65K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $3.5/1M 토큰, 출력 $35/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index83 / 100
Input Token:

$3.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$35.00 / 1M

Context Window:

65.5K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Google

Nano Banana

심층 추론 모델

Google의 Nano Banana 모델은 32K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $2/1M 토큰, 출력 $20/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Nano Banana is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Nano Banana Pro has a larger context window (66K vs 33K tokens).
  • Nano Banana is faster at 60 tok/s vs 50 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureNano Banana ProNano Banana
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8375
Provider
GoogleGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$3.50 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$35.00 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$4.76 / 1M$2.75 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
65.5K tokens~98 A4 pages of text32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
16K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
50 tok/s60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/AN/A
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.80 / 1M$0.50 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Nano Banana
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Nano Banana
+20% faster generation
Context
Nano Banana Pro
65.5K tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nano Banana ProNano Banana
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1415ptsvs1360pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

50 tok/s vs60 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Nano Banana Pro1.20s
Nano Banana0.90s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Nano Banana Pro11.20s
Nano Banana9.23s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Nano Banana Pro Monthly API Bill
$37.95 / month
$3.5/1M in · $35/1M out
Nano Banana Monthly API Bill
$21.75 / month
$2/1M in · $20/1M out
Nano Banana saves approximately $16.20 / month (43%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Nano Banana Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Google의 첨단 High-fidelity design-grade image generation and compositional editor 아키텍처와 최대 65K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $3.5/1M, 출력 $35/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Nano Banana · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Google의 첨단 Conversational in-context image generation and editing transformer 아키텍처와 최대 32K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $2/1M, 출력 $20/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricNano Banana ProNano Banana
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.05$0.03
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
2K1K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
1K0K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureNano Banana ProNano Banana
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/nano-banana-promodels/nano-banana
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2025-112025-08
Knowledge CutoffSeptember 2025June 2025
ArchitectureHigh-fidelity design-grade image generation and compositional editorConversational in-context image generation and editing transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($3.5/1M in) across full 66K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 33K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.8/1M with configurable TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.5/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiesimageimage

Nano Banana Pro vs Nano Banana: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nano Banana Pro or Nano Banana?

Nano Banana Pro is more intelligent. It scores 83 compared with 75 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nano Banana is faster, generating 60 tokens per second compared with 50 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Nano Banana is cheaper at $2.75 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $4.76 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Nano Banana has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.90s compared with 1.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Nano Banana Pro has a larger context window, supporting 65.5K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.

종합 평가

Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Nano Banana Pro if your priority is Brand kit production, professional UI asset generation, and commercial marketing campaigns. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Nano Banana if your workflow prioritizes Storyboarding, consistent character illustration, and interactive image tweaking. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

How does Nano Banana Pro compare to Nano Banana in API token pricing and cost per token?+

Nano Banana Pro costs $3.50 per 1M input tokens and $35.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas Nano Banana costs $2.00 input and $20.00 output. Overall, Nano Banana is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.

Which model has a larger context window: Nano Banana Pro or Nano Banana?+

Nano Banana Pro supports a context window of 66K tokens (~49k words), while Nano Banana supports 33K tokens (~25k words). Therefore, Nano Banana Pro can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.

Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Nano Banana Pro or Nano Banana?+

Nano Banana Pro scores at the frontier of coding benchmarks, while Nano Banana scores competitively for software generation. For complex autonomous debugging and agentic engineering, Nano Banana Pro provides robust code generation and tool calling.

What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Nano Banana Pro and Nano Banana?+

Nano Banana Pro features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Nano Banana provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.

How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Nano Banana Pro and Nano Banana?+

Nano Banana Pro generates approximately 50 tokens per second, while Nano Banana delivers 60 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Nano Banana provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.

Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Nano Banana Pro and Nano Banana to optimize costs?+

Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Nano Banana to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Nano Banana Pro. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs