Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Kimi K2.6 by Moonshot AI against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Kimi K2.6
자율 에이전트 및 도구 호출 특화Moonshot AI의 Kimi K2.6 모델은 자율 에이전트 워크플로우, 도구 호출(Tool Calling) 및 다단계 업무 자동화에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 262K 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 68 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 87/100점(무료 오픈 웨이트 제공)을 제공합니다.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
54%
Gemini 4 Argon
네이티브 멀티모달 AIGoogle의 Gemini 4 Argon 모델은 텍스트와 이미지의 네이티브 멀티모달 이해 및 복합 문서·차트 분석에 최적화된 AI 모델로, 1M 컨텍스트 윈도우, 초당 115 토큰의 생성 속도, 종합 지능 지수 97/100점(1M 토큰당 입력 $2 / 출력 $10)을 제공합니다.
$2.00 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
1M tokens
81.9%
한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점
- Kimi K2.6 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
- Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 68 tok/s.
- Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 54.0%).
| Feature | Kimi K2.6 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 87 | 97 |
Provider | Moonshot AI | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $2.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $1.47 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 1000K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 68 tok/s | 115 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 54% | 81.9% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 71% | 81.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
부문별 우위 모델
At-a-glance decision framework검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Kimi K2.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 262K 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 16K 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 54% · GPQA Diamond 71%)
- 초당 68 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 590ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
- 오픈 웨이트 아키텍처 (1.5T total (40B MoE))를 통해 vLLM, SGLang, Ollama 기반 자체 GPU 서버 구축 및 파인튜닝 가능
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 비양자화 전체 정밀도로 로컬 서버에서 구동하려면 충분한 GPU VRAM 용량이 필요합니다
- 초고난도 학술 연구 및 수학 증명 과제에서는 상위 대형 추론 특화 모델이 더 깊은 분석을 제공할 수 있습니다
Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1M 컨텍스트 윈도우 및 최대 1M 출력 토큰 생성 지원 (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
- 초당 115 토큰의 빠른 처리 속도와 850ms에 불과한 첫 토큰 지연 시간(TTFT)
- 합리적인 API 요금 체계(1M 토큰당 입력 $2 / 출력 $10)와 프롬프트 캐싱, 함수 호출 및 정형화된 JSON 출력 완벽 지원
Considerations & Trade-offs
- 독점 클라우드 전용 모델로 로컬 오프라인 서버에 가중치를 다운로드하여 실행할 수 없습니다
- 대규모 프로덕션 호출 환경에서는 비용 절감을 위해 프롬프트 캐싱과 배치 API(Batch API) 활용이 권장됩니다
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $2.45 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 25K | 75K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 9K | 36K |
기술 사양 (Specifications)
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Kimi K2.6 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | kimi-k2-6 | models/gemini-4-argon |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-04 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | February 2026 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Refined Multimodal Agentic MoE Transformer | Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | 1.5T total (40B active MoE) | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 930 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 3225 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 4 Argon: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 87 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 68 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Kimi K2.6 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Kimi K2.6 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.59s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 262.1K tokens.
종합 평가
Choose Kimi K2.6 for 자율 에이전트 워크플로우, 도구 호출(tool calling) 및 다단계 업무 자동화, 엔터프라이즈 rag 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 api 연동에 최적., or choose Gemini 4 Argon for 텍스트와 이미지의 네이티브 멀티모달 이해 및 복합 문서·차트 분석, 엔터프라이즈 rag 지식베이스 및 대규모 프로덕션 api 연동에 최적..
자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Kimi K2.6 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 4 Argon?+
Kimi K2.6 supports 262K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: 벤치마크, API 요금 및 속도 비교 (2026)비교
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
공식 출처: Moonshot AI & Google Official Documentation