Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT Realtime Whisper vs Kimi K3

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (4)
OpenAIMoonshot AIlightweightflagship

Compare GPT Realtime Whisper by OpenAI against Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT Realtime Whisper

고성능 AI 모델

OpenAI의 GPT Realtime Whisper 모델은 448 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0.006/1M 토큰, 출력 $0/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$0.01 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

448 tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

36%

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3

오픈 웨이트 모델

Moonshot AI의 Kimi K3 모델은 1.0M 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0/1M 토큰, 출력 $0/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.5%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Kimi K3 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Kimi K3 has a larger context window (1M vs 0K tokens).
  • GPT Realtime Whisper is faster at 140 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
  • Kimi K3 leads on SWE-bench coding (74.5% vs 36.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT Realtime WhisperKimi K3
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4493
Provider
OpenAIMoonshot AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
448 tokens~1 A4 pages of text1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
0K131K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
140 tok/s58 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
36%74.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
46%79%

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Kimi K3
+38.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Kimi K3
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT Realtime Whisper
+141% faster generation
Context
Kimi K3
1.05M tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT Realtime WhisperKimi K3
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

36%vs74.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

46%vs79%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

66%vs88.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1255ptsvs1480pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

5.5%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

23%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

24.5%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

39%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

46%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

61%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

140 tok/s vs58 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT Realtime Whisper0.15s
Kimi K30.72s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT Realtime Whisper3.72s
Kimi K39.34s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT Realtime Whisper Monthly API Bill
$0.01 / month
$0.006/1M in · $0/1M out
Kimi K3 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Kimi K3 saves approximately $0.01 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

GPT Realtime Whisper · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • OpenAI의 첨단 Streaming speech-to-text transformer 아키텍처와 최대 448 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0.006/1M, 출력 $0/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Kimi K3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Moonshot AI의 첨단 Colossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts 아키텍처와 최대 1.0M 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0/1M, 출력 $0/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT Realtime WhisperKimi K3
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.04$2.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
3K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K18K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT Realtime WhisperKimi K3
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-realtime-whisperkimi-k3
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-052026-07
Knowledge CutoffFebruary 2026March 2026
ArchitectureStreaming speech-to-text transformerColossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential2.8T total (MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.006/1M in) across full 0K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentText-only completion (No GUI action loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingPrompt-based JSON extraction onlyNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1736 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 6020 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiesaudiotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT Realtime Whisper vs Kimi K3: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT Realtime Whisper or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT Realtime Whisper is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

GPT Realtime Whisper has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.15s compared with 0.72s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Kimi K3 has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 448 tokens.

종합 평가

Choose GPT Realtime Whisper for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 openai 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인, or choose Kimi K3 for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 moonshot ai 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: GPT Realtime Whisper or Kimi K3?+

GPT Realtime Whisper costs $0.006/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while Kimi K3 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: GPT Realtime Whisper or Kimi K3?+

GPT Realtime Whisper supports 0K tokens whereas Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: OpenAI & Moonshot AI Official Documentation