Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (4)
OpenAIOpenAIflagshipflagship

Compare GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-6 Sol

심층 추론 모델

OpenAI의 GPT-6 Sol 모델은 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $2.0/1M 토큰, 출력 $10.0/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.1%

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

심층 추론 모델

OpenAI의 GPT-6.1 Sol 모델은 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $2.0/1M 토큰, 출력 $10.0/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol is faster at 120 tok/s vs 116 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 82.1%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9394
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
116 tok/s120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
82.1%82.3%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
80.6%80.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+0.2% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
GPT-6.1 Sol
+3% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

82.1%vs82.3%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

80.6%vs80.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.8%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1516ptsvs1519pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18%vs18.1%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

63.2%vs63.6%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

54.5%vs54.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

79.5%vs79.7%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93.4%vs93.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

90.8%vs91%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

116 tok/s vs120 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-6 Sol1.16s
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-6 Sol5.47s
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-6 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

GPT-6 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • OpenAI의 첨단 Cost-efficient frontier unified reasoning model 아키텍처와 최대 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $2.0/1M, 출력 $10.0/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • OpenAI의 첨단 Near-Astra unified reasoning model 아키텍처와 최대 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $2.0/1M, 출력 $10.0/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.00$2.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
62K62K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K36K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-6-solgpt-6-1-sol
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026April 2026
ArchitectureCost-efficient frontier unified reasoning modelNear-Astra unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6 Sol or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6.1 Sol is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 116 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-6.1 Sol has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.12s compared with 1.16s.

종합 평가

Choose GPT-6 Sol for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 openai 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인, or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 openai 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: GPT-6 Sol or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

GPT-6 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: GPT-6 Sol or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

GPT-6 Sol supports 1M tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: OpenAI & OpenAI Official Documentation