Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Aya Expanse 32B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (4)
GoogleCohereflagshipopen-source

Compare Gemini 4 Argon by Google against Aya Expanse 32B by Cohere across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 4 Argon

심층 추론 모델

Google의 Gemini 4 Argon 모델은 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $2/1M 토큰, 출력 $10/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Cohere

Aya Expanse 32B

오픈 웨이트 모델

Cohere의 Aya Expanse 32B 모델은 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0.25/1M 토큰, 출력 $0.5/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index44 / 100
Input Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

33.5%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Aya Expanse 32B is 13.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 85 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 33.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 32B
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9744
Provider
GoogleCohere
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.25 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00 / 1M$0.50 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.47 / 1M$0.14 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
1000K8K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
115 tok/s85 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
81.9%33.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
81.5%50%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.06 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+48.4% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Aya Expanse 32B
13.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+35% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 32B
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

81.9%vs33.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.5%vs50%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

90.8%vs73%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1525ptsvs1265pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

18.9%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

57.4%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

56.4%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

80.5%vsN/A
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

94.8%vsN/A
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

96.4%vs72%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

115 tok/s vs85 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Aya Expanse 32B0.44s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s
Aya Expanse 32B6.32s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Aya Expanse 32B Monthly API Bill
$0.92 / month
$0.25/1M in · $0.5/1M out
Aya Expanse 32B saves approximately $11.23 / month (92%) under this workload.13.3x Savings

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Google의 첨단 Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts 아키텍처와 최대 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $2/1M, 출력 $10/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Aya Expanse 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Cohere의 첨단 High-Capacity Multilingual Transformer 아키텍처와 최대 128K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0.25/1M, 출력 $0.5/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 32B
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.45$0.18
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
75K28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
36K0K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 4 ArgonAya Expanse 32B
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-4-argonaya-expanse-32b
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092024-10
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026August 2024
ArchitecturePathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsHigh-Capacity Multilingual Transformer
ParametersConfidential32B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFlat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTLCached input at $0.06/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 4 Argon vs Aya Expanse 32B: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 4 Argon or Aya Expanse 32B?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 85 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Aya Expanse 32B is cheaper at $0.14 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Aya Expanse 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.44s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.

종합 평가

Choose Gemini 4 Argon for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 google 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인, or choose Aya Expanse 32B for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 cohere 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 4 Argon or Aya Expanse 32B?+

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens, while Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.25/1M input and $0.5/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 4 Argon or Aya Expanse 32B?+

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens whereas Aya Expanse 32B supports 128K tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: Google & Cohere Official Documentation