Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Codestral vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs 연구팀 검토 완료최종 검토일: October 2026편집 정책
공유
Related topics (4)
Mistral AIGooglecodingflagship

Compare Codestral by Mistral AI against Gemini 4 Argon by Google across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

1:1 모델 맞대결 비교 (VS)

원하는 AI 모델 선택 및 실시간 비교

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Mistral AI

Codestral

오픈 웨이트 모델

Mistral AI의 Codestral 모델은 256K 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $0.2/1M 토큰, 출력 $0.6/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index40 / 100
Input Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.60 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

28%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

심층 추론 모델

Google의 Gemini 4 Argon 모델은 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 윈도우와 입력 $2/1M 토큰, 출력 $10/1M 토큰의 합리적인 API 요금을 제공하며 코딩, 추론 및 엔터프라이즈 자동화에 최적화되어 있습니다.

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

한눈에 보는 핵심 차이점

  • Codestral is 13.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 28.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureCodestralGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4097
Provider
Mistral AIGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.20 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.60 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.14 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
28%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
42%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.05 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

부문별 우위 모델

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+53.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Codestral
13.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+5% faster generation
Context
Gemini 4 Argon
1M tokens window

검증된 벤치마크 점수 비교

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

CodestralGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

28%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

42%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

70%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1240ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs115 tok/s

지연 시간(Latency) 및 응답 속도

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Codestral0.35s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Codestral4.90s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

실시간 API 토큰 비용 시뮬레이터

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Codestral Monthly API Bill
$0.92 / month
$0.2/1M in · $0.6/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Codestral saves approximately $11.23 / month (92%) under this workload.13.3x Savings

Codestral · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Mistral AI의 첨단 Code-Optimized Transformer with 32K Window 아키텍처와 최대 256K 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $0.2/1M, 출력 $0.6/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Google의 첨단 Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts 아키텍처와 최대 1M 토큰 컨텍스트 지원
  • 경쟁력 있는 API 가격(입력 $2/1M, 출력 $10/1M)과 빠른 응답 속도
  • 코드 생성, 복잡한 논리 추론 및 다국어 벤치마크에서 검증된 성능 발휘
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • 대규모 장문 컨텍스트 처리 시 토큰 비용 및 호출 한도 관리가 필요함
  • 특수 도메인 작업에서는 정교한 프롬프트 엔지니어링과 RAG 연동이 권장됨

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricCodestralGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K36K

기술 사양 (Specifications)

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureCodestralGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)codestral-latestmodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2024-052026-09
Knowledge CutoffMay 2024June 2026
ArchitectureCode-Optimized Transformer with 32K WindowPathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters22BConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 256K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.05/1M tokensImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 14 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 47 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Codestral vs Gemini 4 Argon: 핵심 요약 문답 (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Codestral or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 40 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Codestral is cheaper at $0.14 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Codestral has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.35s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.

종합 평가

Choose Codestral for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 mistral ai 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인, or choose Gemini 4 Argon for 기업 업무 자동화, 소프트웨어 개발, 자율형 ai 에이전트 및 google 기반 프로덕션 파이프라인.

자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)

Which is cheaper: Codestral or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Codestral costs $0.2/1M input and $0.6/1M output tokens, while Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Codestral or Gemini 4 Argon?+

Codestral supports 256K tokens whereas Gemini 4 Argon supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

공식 출처: Mistral AI & Google Official Documentation