QwQ 32B Preview vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
QwQ 32B Preview di Alibaba e Qwen2.5-VL 72B di Alibaba sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. QwQ 32B Preview offre una finestra di contesto di 32.8K token a $0.20/$0.60 per milione di token, mentre Qwen2.5-VL 72B mette a disposizione 131.1K token di contesto a $0.00/$0.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.
Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
QwQ 32B Preview
Ragionamento a Pesi ApertiQwQ 32B Preview di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, con finestra di contesto da 33K, velocità di 52 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 47/100 e tariffa
$0.20 / 1M
$0.60 / 1M
32.8K tokens
54.2%
Qwen2.5-VL 72B
IA Multimodale NativaQwen2.5-VL 72B di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 55 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 79/100
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
38%
Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B has a larger context window (131K vs 33K tokens).
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B is faster at 55 tok/s vs 52 tok/s.
- QwQ 32B Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (54.2% vs 38.0%).
| Feature | QwQ 32B Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 47 | 79 |
Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.20 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.60 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.14 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 52 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 54.2% | 38% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 65.2% | 58% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Chi vince in ogni categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPunteggi Benchmark Verificati
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenza e Tempo di Risposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
QwQ 32B Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 33K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 54.2% · GPQA Diamond 65.2%)
- Throughput elevato di 52 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 820 ms
- Pesi aperti (32B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Qwen2.5-VL 72B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 38% · GPQA Diamond 58%)
- Throughput elevato di 55 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 720 ms
- Pesi aperti (72B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | QwQ 32B Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.45 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 22K | 20K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 18K | 6K |
Specifiche Tecniche
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | QwQ 32B Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwq-32b-instruct | qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2024-11 | 2024-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2024 | June 2024 |
| Architecture | Reinforcement Learning Reasoning Transformer | Open-Weights Multimodal Vision-Language Transformer |
| Parameters | 32B | 72B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 33K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.05/1M tokens | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 45 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 155 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
QwQ 32B Preview vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, QwQ 32B Preview or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B is more intelligent. It scores 79 compared with 47 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B is faster, generating 55 tokens per second compared with 52 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.14 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.72s compared with 0.82s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.
Verdetto
Sia QwQ 32B Preview (Ideale per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Qwen2.5-VL 72B (Ideale per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Qwen2.5-VL 72B guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Qwen2.5-VL 72B garantisce una generazione più rapida e Qwen2.5-VL 72B offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.
Domande Frequenti (FAQ)
Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, QwQ 32B Preview o Qwen2.5-VL 72B?+
Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Qwen2.5-VL 72B. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.
Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra QwQ 32B Preview e Qwen2.5-VL 72B?+
QwQ 32B Preview costa $0.20 / $0.60 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Qwen2.5-VL 72B costa $0.00 / $0.00. Nel costo combinato, Qwen2.5-VL 72B risulta più economico.
Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+
QwQ 32B Preview supporta 32.8K token di contesto contro 131.1K token di Qwen2.5-VL 72B, mentre Qwen2.5-VL 72B offre una velocità di generazione superiore.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B vs QwQ 32B Preview: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Phi-4 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs QwQ 32B Preview: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Alibaba e Alibaba, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).