Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct di Alibaba e Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B di Alibaba sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct offre una finestra di contesto di 262.1K token a $0.00/$0.00 per milione di token, mentre Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B mette a disposizione 128K token di contesto a $0.20/$0.60 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.
Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct
Modello Base a Pesi ApertiQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 262K, velocità di 140 token/s, indice di intellig
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
262.1K tokens
N/A
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Specialista Codice Open-WeightsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per lo sviluppo software e la generazione di codice con pesi aperti auto-ospitabili, con finestra di contesto da 128K, velocità di 78 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 43/100 e ta
$0.20 / 1M
$0.60 / 1M
128K tokens
48.6%
Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has a larger context window (262K vs 128K tokens).
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is faster at 140 tok/s vs 78 tok/s.
| Feature | Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 76 | 43 |
Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.20 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.60 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.13 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 140 tok/s | 78 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 48.6% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 48.2% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.04 / 1M |
Chi vince in ogni categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Punteggi Benchmark Verificati
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenza e Tempo di Risposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 262K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (MMLU-Pro 74% · Arena Elo 1285)
- Throughput elevato di 140 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 280 ms
- Pesi aperti (30B total (3B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 128K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 48.6% · GPQA Diamond 48.2%)
- Throughput elevato di 78 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 540 ms
- Pesi aperti (32B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.18 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 15K | 35K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Specifiche Tecniche
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct | qwen-2-5-coder-32b-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-04 | 2024-11 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | March 2025 | September 2024 |
| Architecture | Compact Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Transformer | Dense Code-Specialized Transformer |
| Parameters | 30B total (3B active MoE) | 32B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Cached input at $0.04/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is more intelligent. It scores 76 compared with 43 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 78 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.13 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.28s compared with 0.54s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Verdetto
Sia Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (Ideale per lo sviluppo software e la generazione di codice con pesi aperti auto-ospitabili, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct garantisce una generazione più rapida e Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.
Domande Frequenti (FAQ)
Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct o Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?+
Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.
Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct e Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?+
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct costa $0.00 / $0.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B costa $0.20 / $0.60. Nel costo combinato, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct risulta più economico.
Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct supporta 262.1K token di contesto contro 128K token di Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B, mentre Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct offre una velocità di generazione superiore.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct vs Devstral Medium: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Alibaba e Alibaba, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).