Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max di Alibaba e Qwen3.8 Max Preview di Alibaba sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Qwen3.7 Max offre una finestra di contesto di 1M token a $1.80/$7.20 per milione di token, mentre Qwen3.8 Max Preview mette a disposizione 1M token di contesto a $0.00/$0.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Alibaba

Qwen3.7 Max

IA Agentica e Strumenti Autonomi

Qwen3.7 Max di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 80 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 92/100 e tariffa di $1.8/$7

Intelligence Index92 / 100
Input Token:

$1.80 / 1M

Output Token:

$7.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

73.5%

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

Qwen3.8 Max Preview di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 60 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 93/1

Intelligence Index93 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.2%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 80 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (75.2% vs 73.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 Max Preview
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
9293
Provider
AlibabaAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.80 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$7.20 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.21 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
32K32K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
80 tok/s60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
73.5%75.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%79.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.18 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
+1.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Qwen3.7 Max
+33% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

73.5%vs75.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs79.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs89%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1470ptsvs1485pts
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs77%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

86%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

80 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Qwen3.7 Max0.58s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview0.68s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Qwen3.7 Max6.83s
Qwen3.8 Max Preview9.01s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Qwen3.7 Max Monthly API Bill
$9.45 / month
$1.8/1M in · $7.2/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3.8 Max Preview saves approximately $9.45 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Qwen3.7 Max · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 32K token (SWE-bench Verified 73.5% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 80 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 580 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($1.8/$7.2 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 32K token (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 60 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 680 ms
  • Pesi aperti (2.4T total (95B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 Max Preview
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.38$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
32K35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
14K15K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)qwen3-7-max-instructqwen3-8-max-preview-instruct
API ProtocolAlibaba REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-052026-07
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026April 2026
ArchitectureNext-Generation Deep Frontier Reasoning TransformerColossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
ParametersConfidential2.4T total (95B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.8/1M in) across full 1000K windowFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.18/1M tokensAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAlibaba Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 92 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3.7 Max is faster, generating 80 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.21 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.7 Max has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.58s compared with 0.68s.

Verdetto

Sia Qwen3.7 Max (Ideale per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Qwen3.8 Max Preview (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Qwen3.8 Max Preview guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Qwen3.7 Max garantisce una generazione più rapida e Qwen3.8 Max Preview offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Qwen3.7 Max o Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Qwen3.8 Max Preview. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Qwen3.7 Max e Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Qwen3.7 Max costa $1.80 / $7.20 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Qwen3.8 Max Preview costa $0.00 / $0.00. Nel costo combinato, Qwen3.8 Max Preview risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Qwen3.7 Max supporta 1M token di contesto contro 1M token di Qwen3.8 Max Preview, mentre Qwen3.7 Max offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Alibaba e Alibaba, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).