Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Qwen 2.5 72B di Alibaba e Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct di Alibaba sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Qwen 2.5 72B offre una finestra di contesto di 128K token a $0.35/$0.70 per milione di token, mentre Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct mette a disposizione 131.1K token di contesto a $0.18/$0.36 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.
Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Qwen 2.5 72B
Modello Base a Pesi ApertiQwen 2.5 72B di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 128K, velocità di 64 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 44/100 e
$0.35 / 1M
$0.70 / 1M
128K tokens
45.2%
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct
Modello Base a Pesi ApertiQwen 2.5 32B Instruct di Alibaba è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 85 token/s, indice di intelligenza di
$0.18 / 1M
$0.36 / 1M
131.1K tokens
40.8%
Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio
- Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct has a larger context window (131K vs 128K tokens).
- Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is faster at 85 tok/s vs 64 tok/s.
- Qwen 2.5 72B leads on SWE-bench coding (45.2% vs 40.8%).
| Feature | Qwen 2.5 72B | Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 44 | 41 |
Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.35 / 1M | $0.18 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.70 / 1M | $0.36 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.19 / 1M | $0.10 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 64 tok/s | 85 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 45.2% | 40.8% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 52.8% | 48.5% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.07 / 1M | $0.04 / 1M |
Chi vince in ogni categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPunteggi Benchmark Verificati
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenza e Tempo di Risposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Qwen 2.5 72B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 128K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 45.2% · GPQA Diamond 52.8%)
- Throughput elevato di 64 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 610 ms
- Pesi aperti (72B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 40.8% · GPQA Diamond 48.5%)
- Throughput elevato di 85 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 480 ms
- Pesi aperti (32B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Qwen 2.5 72B | Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.28 | $0.16 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 32K | 28K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Specifiche Tecniche
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Qwen 2.5 72B | Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | qwen-2-5-72b-instruct | qwen-2-5-32b-instruct |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2024-09 | 2024-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2024 | June 2024 |
| Architecture | Dense Autoregressive Transformer | Dense Autoregressive Transformer |
| Parameters | 72B | 32B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($0.18/1M in) across full 131K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.07/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.036/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 45 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 155 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Qwen 2.5 72B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Qwen 2.5 72B or Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct?
Qwen 2.5 72B is more intelligent. It scores 44 compared with 41 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is faster, generating 85 tokens per second compared with 64 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.10 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.19 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.48s compared with 0.61s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Verdetto
Sia Qwen 2.5 72B (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Qwen 2.5 72B guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct garantisce una generazione più rapida e Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.
Domande Frequenti (FAQ)
Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Qwen 2.5 72B o Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct?+
Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Qwen 2.5 72B. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.
Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Qwen 2.5 72B e Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct?+
Qwen 2.5 72B costa $0.35 / $0.70 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct costa $0.18 / $0.36. Nel costo combinato, Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct risulta più economico.
Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+
Qwen 2.5 72B supporta 128K token di contesto contro 131.1K token di Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct, mentre Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct offre una velocità di generazione superiore.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Llama 3.2 1B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Llama 3.2 3B vs Qwen 2.5 72B: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Pixtral 12B vs Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen 2.5 72B: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Alibaba e Alibaba, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).