Head-to-Head Model Comparison

o4-mini-deep-research vs o3-deep-research

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
o4-mini-deep-research vs o3-deep-research: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

o4-mini-deep-research di OpenAI e o3-deep-research di OpenAI sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. o4-mini-deep-research offre una finestra di contesto di 200K token a $2.00/$8.00 per milione di token, mentre o3-deep-research mette a disposizione 200K token di contesto a $10.00/$40.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

o4-mini-deep-research

Motore di Ragionamento Profondo

o4-mini-deep-research di OpenAI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, con finestra di contesto da 200K, velocità di 70 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 48/100 e

Intelligence Index48 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$8.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

48.5%

OpenAI

o3-deep-research

Motore di Ragionamento Profondo

o3-deep-research di OpenAI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, con finestra di contesto da 200K, velocità di 45 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 55/100 e tarif

Intelligence Index55 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$40.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

55%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • o4-mini-deep-research is 5.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • o4-mini-deep-research is faster at 70 tok/s vs 45 tok/s.
  • o3-deep-research leads on SWE-bench coding (55.0% vs 48.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
Featureo4-mini-deep-researcho3-deep-research
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4855
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$8.00 / 1M$40.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.55 / 1M$7.75 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
100K100K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
70 tok/s45 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
48.5%55%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
68%74.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$2.50 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
o3-deep-research
+6.5% SWE-bench lead
Cost
o4-mini-deep-research
5.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
o4-mini-deep-research
+56% faster generation
Context
Tied
200K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

o4-mini-deep-researcho3-deep-research
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

48.5%vs55%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

68%vs74.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

80.5%vs85.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1318ptsvs1336pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

11.8%vs13.2%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

33.5%vs41%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

35%vs43%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

60%vs68%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

85%vs87.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

76%vs82%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

70 tok/s vs45 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
o4-mini-deep-research2.40s
o3-deep-research3.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
o4-mini-deep-research9.54s
o3-deep-research14.51s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
o4-mini-deep-research Monthly API Bill
$10.95 / month
$2/1M in · $8/1M out
o3-deep-research Monthly API Bill
$54.75 / month
$10/1M in · $40/1M out
o4-mini-deep-research saves approximately $43.80 / month (80%) under this workload.5.0x Savings

o4-mini-deep-research · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 200K con capacità massima di output fino a 100K token (SWE-bench Verified 48.5% · GPQA Diamond 68%)
  • Throughput elevato di 70 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 2400 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$8 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

o3-deep-research · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 200K con capacità massima di output fino a 100K token (SWE-bench Verified 55% · GPQA Diamond 74.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 45 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 3400 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($10/$40 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metrico4-mini-deep-researcho3-deep-research
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$1.10$7.28
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
75K90K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
30K42K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Featureo4-mini-deep-researcho3-deep-research
Official API Model ID (SDK)o4-mini-deep-researcho3-deep-research
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2025-062025-06
Knowledge CutoffJune 2024June 2024
ArchitectureCompact agentic reasoning transformerAgentic reasoning transformer with web and file tools
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 200K windowFlat rate ($10/1M in) across full 200K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $2.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

o4-mini-deep-research vs o3-deep-research: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, o4-mini-deep-research or o3-deep-research?

o3-deep-research is more intelligent. It scores 55 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

o4-mini-deep-research is faster, generating 70 tokens per second compared with 45 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

o4-mini-deep-research is cheaper at $1.55 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.75 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

o4-mini-deep-research has lower latency, with a time to first token of 2.40s compared with 3.40s.

Verdetto

Sia o4-mini-deep-research (Ideale per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia o3-deep-research (Ideale per il ragionamento logico profondo, la matematica avanzata e l’analisi scientifica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: o3-deep-research guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, o4-mini-deep-research garantisce una generazione più rapida e o4-mini-deep-research offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, o4-mini-deep-research o o3-deep-research?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale o3-deep-research. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra o4-mini-deep-research e o3-deep-research?+

o4-mini-deep-research costa $2.00 / $8.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre o3-deep-research costa $10.00 / $40.00. Nel costo combinato, o4-mini-deep-research risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

o4-mini-deep-research supporta 200K token di contesto contro 200K token di o3-deep-research, mentre o4-mini-deep-research offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di OpenAI e OpenAI, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).