Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BProfile

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

NVIDIA

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

Ragionamento a Pesi Aperti

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B di NVIDIA è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, con finestra di contesto da 256K, velocità di 155 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 46/10

Intelligence Index46 / 100

Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

39.5%

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B di NVIDIA è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 262K, velocità di 130 token/s, indice di intelligenza d

Intelligence Index45 / 100

Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

262.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

38%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a larger context window (262K vs 256K tokens).
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is faster at 155 tok/s vs 130 tok/s.
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B leads on SWE-bench coding (39.5% vs 38.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B	Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	46	45
Provider	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.10 / 1M	$0.10 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.25 / 1M	$0.25 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.06 / 1M	$0.06 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text	262.1K tokens~393 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	16K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	155 tok/s	130 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	39.5%	38%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	55.2%	54%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.02 / 1M	$0.02 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

+1.5% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

+19% faster generation

Context

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

262.1K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

39.5%vs38%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

55.2%vs54%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

76%vs75%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1295ptsvs1285pts

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

35%vs34%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

65%vs64%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

77%vs76%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

155 tok/s vs130 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B0.27s

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B0.32s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B3.50s

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B4.17s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B Monthly API Bill

$0.41 / month

$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Monthly API Bill

$0.41 / month

$0.1/1M in · $0.25/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 256K con capacità massima di output fino a 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 39.5% · GPQA Diamond 55.2%)
Throughput elevato di 155 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 270 ms
Pesi aperti (30B (3B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 262K con capacità massima di output fino a 16K token (SWE-bench Verified 38% · GPQA Diamond 54%)
Throughput elevato di 130 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 320 ms
Pesi aperti (30B (3B MoE)) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B	Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.11	$0.12
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	28K	28K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	11K	10K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B	Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	nemotron-cascade-2-30b-a3b	nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-03	2025-12
Knowledge Cutoff	January 2026	October 2025
Architecture	Cascaded Speculative MoE (30B Total / 3B Active)	Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (30B Total / 3B Active)
Parameters	30B (3B active MoE)	30B (3B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 256K window	Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 262K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.02/1M tokens	Cached input at $0.02/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 19 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 65 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 45 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is faster, generating 155 tokens per second compared with 130 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.27s compared with 0.32s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a larger context window, supporting 262.1K tokens compared with 256K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B (Ideale per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B garantisce una generazione più rapida e Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B o Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B e Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?+

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B costa $0.10 / $0.25 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costa $0.10 / $0.25. Nel costo combinato, Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B supporta 256K token di contesto contro 262.1K token di Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, mentre Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Specifiche Tecniche

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Verdetto

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Related reading