GetInfoUs
Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 vs Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 vs Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 di NVIDIA e Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 di NVIDIA sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 offre una finestra di contesto di 128K token a $0.03/$0.03 per milione di token, mentre Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 mette a disposizione 32K token di contesto a $0.02/$0.02 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
NVIDIA

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2

Modello Leggero ed Economico

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 di NVIDIA è un modello di IA progettato per la massima efficienza dei costi per token e l’inferenza rapida in produzione, con finestra di contesto da 128K, velocità di 240 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 33

Intelligence Index33 / 100
Input Token:

$0.03 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.03 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

NVIDIA

Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2

Embedding Vettoriali e RAG

Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 di NVIDIA è un modello di IA progettato per la ricerca vettoriale semantica, l’indicizzazione documentale e le pipeline RAG, con finestra di contesto da 32K, velocità di 280 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 3

Intelligence Index32 / 100
Input Token:

$0.02 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.02 / 1M

Context Window:

32K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 is 1.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 has a larger context window (128K vs 32K tokens).
  • Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 is faster at 280 tok/s vs 240 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureLlama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3332
Provider
NVIDIANVIDIA
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.03 / 1M$0.02 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.03 / 1M$0.02 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.01 / 1M$0.01 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text32K tokens~48 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
2K2K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
240 tok/s280 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/AN/A
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2
1.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2
+17% faster generation
Context
Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2
128K tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1220ptsvs1210pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

240 tok/s vs280 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v20.09s
Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v20.08s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v22.17s
Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v21.87s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 Monthly API Bill
$0.08 / month
$0.03/1M in · $0.03/1M out
Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 Monthly API Bill
$0.06 / month
$0.02/1M in · $0.02/1M out
Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 saves approximately $0.03 / month (34%) under this workload.1.5x Savings

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 128K con capacità massima di output fino a 2K token (Arena Elo 1220)
  • Throughput elevato di 240 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 90 ms
  • Pesi aperti (1B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 32K con capacità massima di output fino a 2K token (Arena Elo 1210)
  • Throughput elevato di 280 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 80 ms
  • Pesi aperti (1B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricLlama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.01$0.01
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
1K1K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureLlama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2
Official API Model ID (SDK)llama-nemotron-rerank-vl-1b-v2llama-nemotron-embed-vl-1b-v2
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-032026-02
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2026December 2025
ArchitectureCross-Encoder Multimodal Reranking TransformerDense Multimodal Embedding Transformer
Parameters1B1B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.03/1M in) across full 128K windowFlat rate ($0.02/1M in) across full 32K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.008/1M tokensCached input at $0.005/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentText-only completion (No GUI action loop)Text-only completion (No GUI action loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingPrompt-based JSON extraction onlyPrompt-based JSON extraction only
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiesscoreembedding

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 vs Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 or Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2?

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 is more intelligent. It scores 33 compared with 32 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 is faster, generating 280 tokens per second compared with 240 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.08s compared with 0.09s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 32K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 (Ideale per la massima efficienza dei costi per token e l’inferenza rapida in produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 (Ideale per la ricerca vettoriale semantica, l’indicizzazione documentale e le pipeline RAG, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 garantisce una generazione più rapida e Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 o Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 e Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2?+

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 costa $0.03 / $0.03 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 costa $0.02 / $0.02. Nel costo combinato, Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Llama Nemotron Rerank VL 1B v2 supporta 128K token di contesto contro 32K token di Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2, mentre Llama Nemotron Embed VL 1B v2 offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & PricingContext WindowAI BenchmarksReasoning ModelsTool CallingModel Context Protocol (MCP)

Related reading

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di NVIDIA e NVIDIA, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).