Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok 4.7 di xAI e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash di DeepSeek sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Grok 4.7 offre una finestra di contesto di 500K token a $2.00/$6.00 per milione di token, mentre DeepSeek V4.1-Flash mette a disposizione 1M token di contesto a $0.30/$1.20 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok 4.7

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

Grok 4.7 di xAI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 500K, velocità di 110 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 46/100 e ta

Intelligence Index46 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

500K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

77.2%

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash di DeepSeek è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 110 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 58

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is 5.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 500K tokens).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is faster at 110 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Grok 4.7 leads on SWE-bench coding (77.2% vs 74.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
4658
Provider
xAIDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$6.00 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.35 / 1M$0.18 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
500K tokens~750 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K384K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
77.2%74.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.5%90.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Grok 4.7
+3.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
5.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+0% faster generation
Context
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

77.2%vs74.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.5%vs90.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.6%vs89.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1465ptsvs1455pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

15.2%vs16.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

38%vs31.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

52.4%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

76.5%vs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

91.2%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

89.5%vs93%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok 4.70.62s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok 4.75.17s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok 4.7 Monthly API Bill
$9.15 / month
$2/1M in · $6/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash saves approximately $7.61 / month (83%) under this workload.5.9x Savings

Grok 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 500K con capacità massima di output fino a 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 77.2% · GPQA Diamond 78.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 110 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 620 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$6 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 384K token (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Throughput elevato di 110 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 460 ms
  • Pesi aperti (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.68$0.27
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
23K28K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGrok 4.7DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-4-7-latestdeepseek-reasoner
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
Architecture2.1T Multimodal Sparse MoECausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)
Parameters2.1T (MoE)763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 500K windowFlat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.5/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.7 or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.35 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 0.62s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 500K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Grok 4.7 (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: DeepSeek V4.1-Flash guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Grok 4.7 garantisce una generazione più rapida e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Grok 4.7 o DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale DeepSeek V4.1-Flash. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Grok 4.7 e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Grok 4.7 costa $2.00 / $6.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre DeepSeek V4.1-Flash costa $0.30 / $1.20. Nel costo combinato, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Grok 4.7 supporta 500K token di contesto contro 1M token di DeepSeek V4.1-Flash, mentre Grok 4.7 offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di xAI e DeepSeek, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).