Head-to-Head Model Comparison

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash di DeepSeek e Gemini 4 Argon di Google sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. DeepSeek V4.1-Flash offre una finestra di contesto di 1M token a $0.30/$1.20 per milione di token, mentre Gemini 4 Argon mette a disposizione 1M token di contesto a $2.00/$10.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Modello Base a Pesi Aperti

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash di DeepSeek è un modello di IA progettato per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 110 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 58

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

IA Multimodale Nativa

Gemini 4 Argon di Google è un modello di IA progettato per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 115 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 97/100 e

Intelligence Index97 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

81.9%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is 7.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 4 Argon is faster at 115 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Gemini 4 Argon leads on SWE-bench coding (81.9% vs 74.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureDeepSeek V4.1-FlashGemini 4 Argon
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5897
Provider
DeepSeekGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.30 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$1.20 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.18 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
384K1000K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
110 tok/s115 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
74.2%81.9%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
90.9%81.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 4 Argon
+7.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
7.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 4 Argon
+5% faster generation
Context
Tied
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

DeepSeek V4.1-FlashGemini 4 Argon
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

74.2%vs81.9%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

90.9%vs81.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.5%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1455ptsvs1525pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

16.8%vs18.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

31.2%vs57.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

48%vs56.4%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs80.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92.4%vs94.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

93%vs96.4%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

110 tok/s vs115 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Gemini 4 Argon0.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s
Gemini 4 Argon5.20s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
Gemini 4 Argon Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash saves approximately $10.61 / month (87%) under this workload.7.9x Savings

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 384K token (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Throughput elevato di 110 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 460 ms
  • Pesi aperti (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Gemini 4 Argon · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 1M token (SWE-bench Verified 81.9% · GPQA Diamond 81.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 115 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 850 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$10 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1-FlashGemini 4 Argon
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.27$2.45
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
58K75K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
28K36K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureDeepSeek V4.1-FlashGemini 4 Argon
Official API Model ID (SDK)deepseek-reasonermodels/gemini-4-argon
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026June 2026
ArchitectureCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)Pathways Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 ControlSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is more intelligent. It scores 97 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 4 Argon is faster, generating 115 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 0.85s.

Verdetto

Sia DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Ideale per il self-hosting su infrastruttura privata, il fine-tuning e la piena sovranità dei dati, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Gemini 4 Argon (Ideale per la comprensione multimodale nativa di testo e immagini e l’analisi visiva dei documenti, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Gemini 4 Argon guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Gemini 4 Argon garantisce una generazione più rapida e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash o Gemini 4 Argon?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Gemini 4 Argon. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra DeepSeek V4.1-Flash e Gemini 4 Argon?+

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash costa $0.30 / $1.20 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Gemini 4 Argon costa $2.00 / $10.00. Nel costo combinato, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash supporta 1M token di contesto contro 1M token di Gemini 4 Argon, mentre Gemini 4 Argon offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di DeepSeek e Google, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).