Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) di xAI e GPT-4.1 di OpenAI sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) offre una finestra di contesto di 1M token a $3.00/$15.00 per milione di token, mentre GPT-4.1 mette a disposizione 1.05M token di contesto a $2.00/$8.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
xAI

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

IA Agentica e Strumenti Autonomi

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) di xAI è un modello di IA progettato per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 135 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 62/100 e tariffa

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$3.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$15.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

61.5%

OpenAI

GPT-4.1

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

GPT-4.1 di OpenAI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1.0M, velocità di 110 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 48/100 e

Intelligence Index48 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$8.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

54.6%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • GPT-4.1 is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-4.1 has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is faster at 135 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads on SWE-bench coding (61.5% vs 54.6%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6248
Provider
xAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$3.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$15.00 / 1M$8.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$2.63 / 1M$1.55 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text1.05M tokens~1,571 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K33K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
135 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
61.5%54.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
65.4%65%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.75 / 1M$0.50 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
+6.9% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-4.1
1.7x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
+23% faster generation
Context
GPT-4.1
1.05M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

61.5%vs54.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

65.4%vs65%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

81.2%vs81%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1360ptsvs1338pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

9.4%vs9.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

39.8%vs30%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

36.5%vs36.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

60.2%vs58.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

76.5%vs55.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

85%vs70%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

135 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)0.42s
GPT-4.10.48s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)4.12s
GPT-4.15.03s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) Monthly API Bill
$19.13 / month
$3/1M in · $15/1M out
GPT-4.1 Monthly API Bill
$10.95 / month
$2/1M in · $8/1M out
GPT-4.1 saves approximately $8.18 / month (43%) under this workload.1.7x Savings

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 61.5% · GPQA Diamond 65.4%)
  • Throughput elevato di 135 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 420 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($3/$15 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

GPT-4.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1.0M con capacità massima di output fino a 33K token (SWE-bench Verified 54.6% · GPQA Diamond 65%)
  • Throughput elevato di 110 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 480 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$8 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.88$0.72
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
35K52K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)GPT-4.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)grok-4-20-non-reasoning-latestgpt-4-1
API ProtocolxAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-032025-04
Knowledge CutoffNovember 2025June 2024
ArchitectureColossus-Scale Sparse MoEDense multimodal transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 1000K windowFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1048K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.75/1M tokensAutomatic prefix caching at $0.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxReal-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code ExecutionNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationxAI Production Safety & Alignment VerifiedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or GPT-4.1?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is more intelligent. It scores 62 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is faster, generating 135 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-4.1 is cheaper at $1.55 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.63 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.42s compared with 0.48s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-4.1 has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (Ideale per i workflow agentici autonomi, il tool calling e l’automazione multi-step, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia GPT-4.1 (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) garantisce una generazione più rapida e GPT-4.1 offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) o GPT-4.1?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning). Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) e GPT-4.1?+

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costa $3.00 / $15.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre GPT-4.1 costa $2.00 / $8.00. Nel costo combinato, GPT-4.1 risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) supporta 1M token di contesto contro 1.05M token di GPT-4.1, mentre Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di xAI e OpenAI, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).