Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GPT-5.4 ProProfile

Claude Opus 5Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Pro

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

GPT-5.4 Pro di OpenAI è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1.1M, velocità di 48 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 81/100

Intelligence Index81 / 100

Input Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$150.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

80.8%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

Claude Opus 5 di Anthropic è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 68 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 75/

Intelligence Index75 / 100

Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.1%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

Claude Opus 5 is 5.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
GPT-5.4 Pro has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
Claude Opus 5 is faster at 68 tok/s vs 48 tok/s.
Claude Opus 5 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.1% vs 80.8%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GPT-5.4 Pro	Claude Opus 5
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	81	75
Provider	OpenAI	Anthropic
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$25.00 / 1M	$5.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$150.00 / 1M	$25.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$21.75 / 1M	$3.85 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1.05M tokens~1,575 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	128K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	48 tok/s	68 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	80.8%	83.1%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	79.4%	80.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$2.50 / 1M	$0.50 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Claude Opus 5

+2.3% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Claude Opus 5

5.7x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Claude Opus 5

+42% faster generation

Context

GPT-5.4 Pro

1.05M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-5.4 ProClaude Opus 5

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

80.8%vs83.1%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

79.4%vs80.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.2%vs90.6%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1450ptsvs1485pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

16%vs17.2%

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

56.5%vs51.8%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

51%vsN/A

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

78%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

94.2%vsN/A

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

85.6%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

48 tok/s vs68 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GPT-5.4 Pro4.60s

Claude Opus 51.50s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GPT-5.4 Pro15.02s

Claude Opus 58.85s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GPT-5.4 Pro Monthly API Bill

$176.25 / month

$25/1M in · $150/1M out

Claude Opus 5 Monthly API Bill

$30.75 / month

$5/1M in · $25/1M out

Claude Opus 5 saves approximately $145.50 / month (83%) under this workload.5.7x Savings

GPT-5.4 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 1.1M con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 80.8% · GPQA Diamond 79.4%)
Throughput elevato di 48 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 4600 ms
Economia API competitiva ($25/$150 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Claude Opus 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 83.1% · GPQA Diamond 80.5%)
Throughput elevato di 68 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1500 ms
Economia API competitiva ($5/$25 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati

Considerations & Trade-offs

Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GPT-5.4 Pro	Claude Opus 5
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$18.50	$5.49
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	72K	72K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	48K	37K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GPT-5.4 Pro	Claude Opus 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)	gpt-5-4-pro	claude-opus-5-20260701
API Protocol	OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date	2026-03	2026-07
Knowledge Cutoff	August 2025	March 2026
Architecture	Maximum-compute agent-ready reasoning model	Thinking-First Autonomous Foundation Architecture
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($25/1M in) across full 1050K window	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix caching at $2.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)	$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.4 Pro or Claude Opus 5?

GPT-5.4 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 81 compared with 75 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Opus 5 is faster, generating 68 tokens per second compared with 48 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Claude Opus 5 is cheaper at $3.85 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $21.75 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Opus 5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.50s compared with 4.60s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Verdetto

Sia GPT-5.4 Pro (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Claude Opus 5 (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: GPT-5.4 Pro guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Claude Opus 5 garantisce una generazione più rapida e Claude Opus 5 offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, GPT-5.4 Pro o Claude Opus 5?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale GPT-5.4 Pro. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra GPT-5.4 Pro e Claude Opus 5?+

GPT-5.4 Pro costa $25.00 / $150.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Claude Opus 5 costa $5.00 / $25.00. Nel costo combinato, Claude Opus 5 risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

GPT-5.4 Pro supporta 1.05M token di contesto contro 1M token di Claude Opus 5, mentre Claude Opus 5 offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

GPT-5.4 Pro

Claude Opus 5

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

GPT-5.4 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Claude Opus 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Specifiche Tecniche

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Verdetto

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Related reading