DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B vs DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B di DeepSeek e DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B di DeepSeek sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B offre una finestra di contesto di 131.1K token a $0.35/$1.05 per milione di token, mentre DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B mette a disposizione 131.1K token di contesto a $0.20/$0.60 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.
Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B
Ragionamento a Pesi ApertiDeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B di DeepSeek è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 48 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 4
$0.35 / 1M
$1.05 / 1M
131.1K tokens
57.5%
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Ragionamento a Pesi ApertiDeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B di DeepSeek è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, con finestra di contesto da 131K, velocità di 58 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 46
$0.20 / 1M
$0.60 / 1M
131.1K tokens
51.2%
Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 1.7x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is faster at 58 tok/s vs 48 tok/s.
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B leads on SWE-bench coding (57.5% vs 51.2%).
| Feature | DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B | DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 48 | 46 |
Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.35 / 1M | $0.20 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $1.05 / 1M | $0.60 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.20 / 1M | $0.11 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 48 tok/s | 58 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 57.5% | 51.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 70% | 65.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.04 / 1M | $0.02 / 1M |
Chi vince in ogni categoria?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPunteggi Benchmark Verificati
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenza e Tempo di Risposta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 57.5% · GPQA Diamond 70%)
- Throughput elevato di 48 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 880 ms
- Pesi aperti (70B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Finestra di contesto da 131K con capacità massima di output fino a 8K token (SWE-bench Verified 51.2% · GPQA Diamond 65.9%)
- Throughput elevato di 58 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 760 ms
- Pesi aperti (32B) pronti per il self-hosting locale o su cloud privato tramite vLLM, SGLang o Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Richiede server GPU dedicati con sufficiente memoria VRAM per l’esecuzione locale a piena precisione
- Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B | DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.42 | $0.26 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 27K | 25K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 21K | 19K |
Specifiche Tecniche
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B | DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | deepseek-reasoner | deepseek-reasoner |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-01 | 2025-01 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | July 2024 | July 2024 |
| Architecture | Dense Distilled Reasoning Transformer | Dense Distilled Reasoning Transformer |
| Parameters | 70B | 32B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.35/1M in) across full 131K window | Flat rate ($0.2/1M in) across full 131K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.035/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix caching at $0.02/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 43 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 151 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 20 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 69 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B vs DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B or DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B?
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B is more intelligent. It scores 48 compared with 46 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is faster, generating 58 tokens per second compared with 48 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper at $0.11 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.20 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.76s compared with 0.88s.
Verdetto
Sia DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B (Ideale per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B (Ideale per il ragionamento Chain-of-Thought a pesi aperti ad alta efficienza algoritmica, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B garantisce una generazione più rapida e DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.
Domande Frequenti (FAQ)
Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B o DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B?+
Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.
Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B e DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B?+
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B costa $0.35 / $1.05 per milione di token di input/output, mentre DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B costa $0.20 / $0.60. Nel costo combinato, DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B risulta più economico.
Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B supporta 131.1K token di contesto contro 131.1K token di DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B, mentre DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B offre una velocità di generazione superiore.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B vs QwQ 32B Preview: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- DeepSeek-R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Phi-4 vs DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Confronto Benchmark, Prezzi API e Velocità (2026)Confronta
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di DeepSeek e DeepSeek, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).