Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 Instant

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 Instant: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 di Anthropic e GPT-5.5 Instant di OpenAI sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Claude Opus 4.8 offre una finestra di contesto di 1M token a $5.00/$25.00 per milione di token, mentre GPT-5.5 Instant mette a disposizione 400K token di contesto a $0.75/$6.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

Claude Opus 4.8 di Anthropic è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 64 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 6

Intelligence Index67 / 100
Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

80.8%

OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Instant

Modello Leggero ed Economico

GPT-5.5 Instant di OpenAI è un modello di IA progettato per la massima efficienza dei costi per token e l’inferenza rapida in produzione, con finestra di contesto da 400K, velocità di 168 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 65/100 e tariffa

Intelligence Index65 / 100
Input Token:

$0.75 / 1M

Output Token:

$6.00 / 1M

Context Window:

400K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.5%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • GPT-5.5 Instant is 4.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 has a larger context window (1M vs 400K tokens).
  • GPT-5.5 Instant is faster at 168 tok/s vs 64 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 4.8 leads on SWE-bench coding (80.8% vs 74.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5 Instant
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6765
Provider
AnthropicOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$5.00 / 1M$0.75 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$25.00 / 1M$6.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$3.85 / 1M$0.80 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
64 tok/s168 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
80.8%74.5%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
78.9%75%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.50 / 1M$0.07 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 4.8
+6.3% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-5.5 Instant
4.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-5.5 Instant
+163% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 4.8
1M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5 Instant
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

80.8%vs74.5%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

78.9%vs75%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

89.6%vs87.2%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1420ptsvs1396pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs13.6%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

54.2%vs49%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs45.5%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs73.5%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs81.5%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

64 tok/s vs168 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Claude Opus 4.81.65s
GPT-5.5 Instant0.78s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Claude Opus 4.89.46s
GPT-5.5 Instant3.76s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Claude Opus 4.8 Monthly API Bill
$30.75 / month
$5/1M in · $25/1M out
GPT-5.5 Instant Monthly API Bill
$6.64 / month
$0.75/1M in · $6/1M out
GPT-5.5 Instant saves approximately $24.11 / month (78%) under this workload.4.6x Savings

Claude Opus 4.8 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 80.8% · GPQA Diamond 78.9%)
  • Throughput elevato di 64 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1650 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($5/$25 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

GPT-5.5 Instant · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 400K con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 74.5% · GPQA Diamond 75%)
  • Throughput elevato di 168 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 780 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($0.75/$6 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Nelle dimostrazioni scientifiche più estreme, i modelli di ragionamento pesante dedicati offrono maggiore profondità

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5 Instant
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$5.49$0.95
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
72K52K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
37K26K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5 Instant
Official API Model ID (SDK)claude-opus-4-8-20260501gpt-5-5-instant
API ProtocolAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AIOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-052026-05
Knowledge CutoffMarch 2026December 2025
ArchitectureFrontier Hybrid Cognitive ArchitectureLow-latency compact reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFlat rate ($0.75/1M in) across full 400K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.075/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP ConnectorsNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt DistillationSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety EvaluatedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 Instant: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5 Instant?

Claude Opus 4.8 is more intelligent. It scores 67 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5.5 Instant is faster, generating 168 tokens per second compared with 64 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-5.5 Instant is cheaper at $0.80 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-5.5 Instant has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.78s compared with 1.65s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.8 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 400K tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Claude Opus 4.8 (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia GPT-5.5 Instant (Ideale per la massima efficienza dei costi per token e l’inferenza rapida in produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Claude Opus 4.8 guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, GPT-5.5 Instant garantisce una generazione più rapida e GPT-5.5 Instant offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Claude Opus 4.8 o GPT-5.5 Instant?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Claude Opus 4.8. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Claude Opus 4.8 e GPT-5.5 Instant?+

Claude Opus 4.8 costa $5.00 / $25.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre GPT-5.5 Instant costa $0.75 / $6.00. Nel costo combinato, GPT-5.5 Instant risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Claude Opus 4.8 supporta 1M token di contesto contro 400K token di GPT-5.5 Instant, mentre GPT-5.5 Instant offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Anthropic e OpenAI, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).