Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Pro

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Verificato dal team di ricerca di GetInfoUsUltima verifica: October 2026Politica editoriale
Condividi
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 di Anthropic e Gemini 3 Pro di Google sono due modelli di IA di riferimento. Claude Fable 5.1 offre una finestra di contesto di 1M token a $10.00/$50.00 per milione di token, mentre Gemini 3 Pro mette a disposizione 2M token di contesto a $2.00/$12.00 per milione di token. Di seguito analizziamo benchmark, latenza e costi.

Confronto Diretto (VS)

Cambia e Confronta Qualsiasi Modello

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

Claude Fable 5.1 di Anthropic è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 1M, velocità di 65 token/s, indice di intelligenza di

Intelligence Index82 / 100
Input Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$50.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.8%

Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Modello Ammiraglia di Frontiera

Gemini 3 Pro di Google è un modello di IA progettato per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, con finestra di contesto da 2M, velocità di 118 token/s, indice di intelligenza di 62/100

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.2%

Differenze Chiave a Colpo d’Occhio

  • Gemini 3 Pro is 4.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 3 Pro is faster at 118 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 leads on SWE-bench coding (83.8% vs 76.2%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8262
Provider
AnthropicGoogle
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$10.00 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$50.00 / 1M$12.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$7.17 / 1M$1.74 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K66K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
65 tok/s118 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
83.8%76.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
81.6%73.5%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.25 / 1M$0.20 / 1M

Chi vince in ogni categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Fable 5.1
+7.6% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 3 Pro
4.3x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro
+82% faster generation
Context
Gemini 3 Pro
2M tokens window

Punteggi Benchmark Verificati

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

83.8%vs76.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

81.6%vs73.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

91%vs86.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1510ptsvs1384pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs12.9%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

62%vs47.9%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs44.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs92.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs84.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs118 tok/s

Latenza e Tempo di Risposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Claude Fable 5.11.45s
Gemini 3 Pro1.80s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Claude Fable 5.19.14s
Gemini 3 Pro6.04s

Simulatore Interattivo dei Costi Token

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Claude Fable 5.1 Monthly API Bill
$60.38 / month
$10/1M in · $50/1M out
Gemini 3 Pro Monthly API Bill
$14.10 / month
$2/1M in · $12/1M out
Gemini 3 Pro saves approximately $46.27 / month (77%) under this workload.4.3x Savings

Claude Fable 5.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 1M con capacità massima di output fino a 128K token (SWE-bench Verified 83.8% · GPQA Diamond 81.6%)
  • Throughput elevato di 65 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1450 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($10/$50 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Gemini 3 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Finestra di contesto da 2M con capacità massima di output fino a 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 76.2% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Throughput elevato di 118 token/secondo con latenza al primo token (TTFT) di soli 1800 ms
  • Economia API competitiva ($2/$12 per 1M di token) con supporto per prompt caching, tool calling e output JSON strutturati
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modello cloud proprietario chiuso; non consente il download locale dei pesi per l’esecuzione offline
  • Per volumi di traffico elevati in produzione si consiglia di attivare il prompt caching e la Batch API

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$10.97$2.40
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
72K60K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
37K31K

Specifiche Tecniche

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3 Pro
Official API Model ID (SDK)claude-fable-5-1-20260901models/gemini-3-pro
API ProtocolAnthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AIGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK
Release Date2026-092025-11
Knowledge CutoffJune 2026January 2025
ArchitectureFrontier Auditable Multimodal TransformerSparse Multimodal MoE
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL$0.25/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.2/1M with configurable TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP ConnectorsBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox
Official Fine-Tuning SupportCustom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt DistillationVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety EvaluatedGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio, video
Output Modalitiestexttext

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3 Pro: Risposte Rapide (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 3 Pro?

Claude Fable 5.1 is more intelligent. It scores 82 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3 Pro is faster, generating 118 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 3 Pro is cheaper at $1.74 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $7.17 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Fable 5.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.45s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Verdetto

Sia Claude Fable 5.1 (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) sia Gemini 3 Pro (Ideale per il ragionamento aziendale di frontiera, la programmazione avanzata e i carichi di produzione, sistemi RAG aziendali e integrazioni API scalabili.) eccellono in produzione: Claude Fable 5.1 guida nei benchmark di ragionamento e programmazione, Gemini 3 Pro garantisce una generazione più rapida e Gemini 3 Pro offre il miglior rapporto qualità-prezzo per carichi API elevati.

Domande Frequenti (FAQ)

Quale modello è migliore per coding e ragionamento, Claude Fable 5.1 o Gemini 3 Pro?+

Nell’indice di intelligenza composito e nei benchmark di programmazione prevale Claude Fable 5.1. Consulta i punteggi SWE-bench e GPQA qui sopra per tutti i dettagli.

Qual è la differenza di prezzo API tra Claude Fable 5.1 e Gemini 3 Pro?+

Claude Fable 5.1 costa $10.00 / $50.00 per milione di token di input/output, mentre Gemini 3 Pro costa $2.00 / $12.00. Nel costo combinato, Gemini 3 Pro risulta più economico.

Quale modello ha la finestra di contesto più ampia e la velocità maggiore?+

Claude Fable 5.1 supporta 1M token di contesto contro 2M token di Gemini 3 Pro, mentre Gemini 3 Pro offre una velocità di generazione superiore.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fonti ufficiali: Documentazione API ufficiale di Anthropic e Google, schede di sistema e benchmark indipendenti (2026).