ERNIE Lite vs Gemma 2
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
ERNIE Lite dari Baidu dan Gemma 2 dari Google adalah dua model AI unggulan. ERNIE Lite menawarkan jendela konteks 128K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Gemma 2 menyediakan konteks 8.2K token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
ERNIE Lite
Model Ringan & Hemat BiayaERNIE Lite dari Baidu adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk efisiensi biaya API maksimal per token dan throughput produksi yang ringan, menghadirkan jendela konteks 128K, kecepatan 190 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 65/100, serta akses grati
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
128K tokens
N/A
Gemma 2
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaGemma 2 dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 8K, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 58/100, serta akses gratis open-w
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
8.2K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- ERNIE Lite has a larger context window (128K vs 8K tokens).
- ERNIE Lite is faster at 190 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
| Feature | ERNIE Lite | Gemma 2 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 65 | 58 |
Provider | Baidu | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 190 tok/s | 110 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
ERNIE Lite · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 128K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (MMLU-Pro 61% · Arena Elo 1180)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 190 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 200 ms
- Bobot terbuka (Confidential / 3B Scale) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Gemma 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 8K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (MMLU-Pro 68.5% · Arena Elo 1250)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 300 ms
- Bobot terbuka (2B / 9B / 27B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | ERNIE Lite | Gemma 2 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 6K | 3K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | ERNIE Lite | Gemma 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | ernie-lite | models/gemma-2 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2024-03 | 2024-06 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2023 | May 2024 |
| Architecture | Ultra-Lightweight Edge-Ready Transformer | Dense transformer with sliding window attention and soft-capping |
| Parameters | Confidential / 3B Scale | 2B / 9B / 27B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 6 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
ERNIE Lite vs Gemma 2: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, ERNIE Lite or Gemma 2?
ERNIE Lite is more intelligent. It scores 65 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
ERNIE Lite is faster, generating 190 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
ERNIE Lite has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.20s compared with 0.30s.
Which model has a larger context window?
ERNIE Lite has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik ERNIE Lite (Sangat cocok untuk efisiensi biaya API maksimal per token dan throughput produksi yang ringan, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemma 2 (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: ERNIE Lite unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, ERNIE Lite memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan ERNIE Lite lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, ERNIE Lite atau Gemma 2?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, ERNIE Lite memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API ERNIE Lite vs Gemma 2?+
ERNIE Lite mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemma 2 sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, ERNIE Lite lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
ERNIE Lite mendukung konteks 128K token dibandingkan 8.2K token pada Gemma 2, sementara ERNIE Lite unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- DBRX Instruct vs ERNIE Lite: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- ERNIE Speed vs ERNIE Lite: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemma 3 vs Gemma 2: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Baidu & Google serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).