Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Aion-3.0 dari AionLabs dan Gemini 3.6 Flash dari Google adalah dua model AI unggulan. Aion-3.0 menawarkan jendela konteks 131.1K token dengan harga $0.50/$2.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Gemini 3.6 Flash menyediakan konteks 1.05M token seharga $0.75/$3.75 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Aion-3.0
Mesin Penalaran MendalamAion-3.0 dari AionLabs adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 80 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 83/100, serta tarif $0.5/$2
$0.50 / 1M
$2.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Pemimpin Pemrograman & KodeGemini 3.6 Flash dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak otonom, refactoring multi-file, dan debugging mendalam, menghadirkan jendela konteks 1.0M, kecepatan 185 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 84/100, serta
$0.75 / 1M
$3.75 / 1M
1.05M tokens
72%
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Aion-3.0 is 1.8x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 131K tokens).
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is faster at 185 tok/s vs 80 tok/s.
| Feature | Aion-3.0 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 83 | 84 |
Provider | AionLabs | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.75 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $2.00 / 1M | $3.75 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.34 / 1M | $0.66 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 66K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 80 tok/s | 185 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 72% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 63.5% | 82.4% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.05 / 1M | $0.19 / 1M |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Aion-3.0 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (GPQA Diamond 63.5% · MMLU-Pro 80%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 80 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 520 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.5/$2 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Gemini 3.6 Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 1.0M dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 66K token (SWE-bench Verified 72% · GPQA Diamond 82.4%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 185 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 370 ms
- Skema harga API kompetitif (tarif $0.75/$3.75 per 1M token) dengan dukungan cache prompt dan output JSON terstruktur
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Model cloud proprietari tertutup; bobot model tidak dapat diunduh untuk penggunaan lokal offline
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Aion-3.0 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.16 | $1.02 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 20K | 39K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 7K | 19K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Aion-3.0 | Gemini 3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | aion-3-0 | models/gemini-3-6-flash |
| API Protocol | AionLabs REST API (OpenAI-Compatible) | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2026-07 | 2026-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | May 2026 | March 2026 |
| Architecture | Deliberate Scientific Reasoning Transformer | Enhanced multimodal mixture-of-experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.5/1M in) across full 131K window | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.05/1M tokens | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.1875/1M with configurable TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | AionLabs Production Safety & Alignment Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision, audio, video |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Aion-3.0 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is more intelligent. It scores 84 compared with 83 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is faster, generating 185 tokens per second compared with 80 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Aion-3.0 is cheaper at $0.34 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.66 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.37s compared with 0.52s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Aion-3.0 (Sangat cocok untuk penalaran logis mendalam, matematika tingkat lanjut, dan analisis ilmiah, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemini 3.6 Flash (Sangat cocok untuk rekayasa perangkat lunak otonom, refactoring multi-file, dan debugging mendalam, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Gemini 3.6 Flash unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemini 3.6 Flash memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Aion-3.0 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Aion-3.0 atau Gemini 3.6 Flash?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Gemini 3.6 Flash memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash?+
Aion-3.0 mengenakan biaya $0.50 / $2.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemini 3.6 Flash sebesar $0.75 / $3.75. Secara keseluruhan, Aion-3.0 lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Aion-3.0 mendukung konteks 131.1K token dibandingkan 1.05M token pada Gemini 3.6 Flash, sementara Gemini 3.6 Flash unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Aion-3.0: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi AionLabs & Google serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).