Gemma 3 vs Gemma 2
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Gemma 3 dari Google dan Gemma 2 dari Google adalah dua model AI unggulan. Gemma 3 menawarkan jendela konteks 131.1K token dengan harga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token, sedangkan Gemma 2 menyediakan konteks 8.2K token seharga $0.00/$0.00 per 1 juta token. Berikut perbandingan lengkap benchmark, latensi, dan biayanya.
Ganti & Bandingkan Model Apa Saja
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Gemma 3
AI Multimodal AsliGemma 3 dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, menghadirkan jendela konteks 131K, kecepatan 105 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 68/100, serta akses gratis o
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
131.1K tokens
N/A
Gemma 2
Model Dasar Bobot TerbukaGemma 2 dari Google adalah model AI yang dirancang untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, menghadirkan jendela konteks 8K, kecepatan 110 token/detik, indeks kecerdasan 58/100, serta akses gratis open-w
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
8.2K tokens
N/A
Perbedaan Utama Sekilas
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Gemma 3 has a larger context window (131K vs 8K tokens).
- Gemma 2 is faster at 110 tok/s vs 105 tok/s.
| Feature | Gemma 3 | Gemma 2 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 68 | 58 |
Provider | ||
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text | 8.2K tokens~12 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 16K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 105 tok/s | 110 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | N/A |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 61% | N/A |
Siapa Unggul di Mana?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Skor Benchmark Terverifikasi
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latensi & Waktu Respons
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulator Biaya Token Interaktif
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemma 3 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 131K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 16K token (GPQA Diamond 61% · MMLU-Pro 78%)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 105 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 320 ms
- Bobot terbuka (1B / 4B / 12B / 27B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Gemma 2 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Jendela konteks 8K dengan kapasitas output maksimum hingga 4K token (MMLU-Pro 68.5% · Arena Elo 1250)
- Kecepatan generasi tinggi 110 token/detik dengan latensi token pertama (TTFT) hanya 300 ms
- Bobot terbuka (2B / 9B / 27B) yang siap di-hosting mandiri di GPU lokal atau cloud privat melalui vLLM dan Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Membutuhkan infrastruktur GPU dengan kapasitas VRAM yang memadai untuk eksekusi lokal presisi penuh
- Pada tugas pembuktian ilmiah tingkat ekstrem, model penalaran berat kelas atas memberikan kedalaman lebih tinggi
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemma 3 | Gemma 2 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 5K | 3K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
Spesifikasi Teknis
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemma 3 | Gemma 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemma-3 | models/gemma-2 |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK |
| Release Date | 2025-03 | 2024-06 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2024 | May 2024 |
| Architecture | Native multimodal open transformer with expanded context | Dense transformer with sliding window attention and soft-capping |
| Parameters | 1B / 4B / 12B / 27B | 2B / 9B / 27B |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemma 3 vs Gemma 2: Jawaban Cepat (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemma 3 or Gemma 2?
Gemma 3 is more intelligent. It scores 68 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemma 2 is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 105 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Gemma 2 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.30s compared with 0.32s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemma 3 has a larger context window, supporting 131.1K tokens compared with 8.2K tokens.
Kesimpulan
Baik Gemma 3 (Sangat cocok untuk pemahaman multimodal asli (teks & visual) serta analisis dokumen kompleks, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) maupun Gemma 2 (Sangat cocok untuk self-hosting di server pribadi, fine-tuning, dan kedaulatan data penuh, sistem RAG perusahaan, dan integrasi API skala produksi.) sangat tangguh: Gemma 3 unggul dalam penalaran dan pemrograman, Gemma 2 memberikan kecepatan generasi token lebih tinggi, dan Gemma 3 lebih hemat biaya untuk penggunaan API skala besar.
Pertanyaan Umum (FAQ)
Mana yang lebih baik untuk coding dan penalaran, Gemma 3 atau Gemma 2?+
Dalam indeks kecerdasan gabungan dan benchmark coding, Gemma 3 memimpin. Lihat skor SWE-bench dan GPQA di atas untuk detailnya.
Berapa perbandingan harga API Gemma 3 vs Gemma 2?+
Gemma 3 mengenakan biaya $0.00 / $0.00 per 1M token input/output, sedangkan Gemma 2 sebesar $0.00 / $0.00. Secara keseluruhan, Gemma 3 lebih hemat biaya.
Model mana yang memiliki jendela konteks lebih besar dan kecepatan lebih tinggi?+
Gemma 3 mendukung konteks 131.1K token dibandingkan 8.2K token pada Gemma 2, sementara Gemma 2 unggul dalam kecepatan output token per detik.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- ERNIE Lite vs Gemma 2: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemma 3 vs Llama 4 Scout: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Gemma 3n vs Gemma 3: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Perbandingan Benchmark, Harga API & Kecepatan (2026)Bandingkan
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Sumber resmi: Dokumentasi API resmi Google & Google serta evaluasi benchmark independen (2026).