Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3 Opus
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google and Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, Gemini 1.5 Pro holds a notable pricing advantage for token ingestion. On output generation, Gemini 1.5 Pro is more economical per million generated tokens. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, Gemini 1.5 Pro provides an expanded memory horizon with 2,000K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Gemini 1.5 Pro leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
किसी भी मॉडल को बदलें और तुलना करें
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Gemini 1.5 Pro
फ्लैगशिप फ्रंटियर मॉडलGoogle द्वारा विकसित Gemini 1.5 Pro एक उन्नत AI मॉडल है, जिसमें 2M टोकन का कॉन्टेक्स्ट विंडो और $1.25/1M इनपुट तथा $5/1M आउटपुट मूल्य निर्धारण है। यह कोडिंग, विश्लेषण और एंटरप्राइज वर्कफ़्लो के लिए उपयुक्त है।
$1.25 / 1M
$5.00 / 1M
2M tokens
32.5%
Claude 3 Opus
फ्लैगशिप फ्रंटियर मॉडलAnthropic द्वारा विकसित Claude 3 Opus एक उन्नत AI मॉडल है, जिसमें 200K टोकन का कॉन्टेक्स्ट विंडो और $15/1M इनपुट तथा $75/1M आउटपुट मूल्य निर्धारण है। यह कोडिंग, विश्लेषण और एंटरप्राइज वर्कफ़्लो के लिए उपयुक्त है।
$15.00 / 1M
$75.00 / 1M
200K tokens
32.2%
एक नज़र में मुख्य अंतर
- Gemini 1.5 Pro is 13.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window (2M vs 200K tokens).
- Gemini 1.5 Pro is faster at 65 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
- Gemini 1.5 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (32.5% vs 32.2%).
| Feature | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 46 | 44 |
Provider | Anthropic | |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $1.25 / 1M | $15.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $75.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.97 / 1M | $11.55 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 8K | 4K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 65 tok/s | 30 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 32.5% | 32.2% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 58.5% | 50.4% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.31 / 1M | $1.50 / 1M |
किस क्षेत्र में कौन आगे है?
At-a-glance decision frameworkसत्यापित बेंचमार्क स्कोर तुलना
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
लेटेंसी और रिस्पॉन्स समय
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
रियल-टाइम टोकन लागत सिम्युलेटर
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Gemini 1.5 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Google की उन्नत Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) Multimodal आर्किटेक्चर और 2M कॉन्टेक्स्ट विंडो क्षमता
- किफायती और पारदर्शी API मूल्य ($1.25/1M इनपुट, $5/1M आउटपुट) तेज़ रिस्पॉन्स के साथ
- जटिल कोडिंग, तार्किक विश्लेषण और बहुभाषी कार्यों में उच्च सटीकता
Considerations & Trade-offs
- बड़े पैमाने पर लंबे कॉन्टेक्स्ट प्रॉम्प्ट्स के लिए टोकन बजट प्रबंधन आवश्यक है
- विशिष्ट डोमेन कार्यों में सर्वोत्तम परिणाम के लिए सटीक प्रॉम्प्ट इंजीनियरिंग की आवश्यकता होती है
Claude 3 Opus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Anthropic की उन्नत Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer आर्किटेक्चर और 200K कॉन्टेक्स्ट विंडो क्षमता
- किफायती और पारदर्शी API मूल्य ($15/1M इनपुट, $75/1M आउटपुट) तेज़ रिस्पॉन्स के साथ
- जटिल कोडिंग, तार्किक विश्लेषण और बहुभाषी कार्यों में उच्च सटीकता
Considerations & Trade-offs
- बड़े पैमाने पर लंबे कॉन्टेक्स्ट प्रॉम्प्ट्स के लिए टोकन बजट प्रबंधन आवश्यक है
- विशिष्ट डोमेन कार्यों में सर्वोत्तम परिणाम के लिए सटीक प्रॉम्प्ट इंजीनियरिंग की आवश्यकता होती है
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.20 | $0.20 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 24K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 0K |
तकनीकी विशिष्टताएँ (Specs)
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | models/gemini-1-5-pro | claude-3-opus-20240301 |
| API Protocol | Google Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDK | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2024-02 | 2024-03 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | May 2024 | August 2023 |
| Architecture | Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) Multimodal | Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Implicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.31/1M with configurable TTL | $1.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Built-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Vertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context Distillation | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework Verified | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3 Opus: त्वरित प्रश्नोत्तर (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Gemini 1.5 Pro or Claude 3 Opus?
Gemini 1.5 Pro is more intelligent. It scores 46 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Gemini 1.5 Pro is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Gemini 1.5 Pro is cheaper at $0.97 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $11.55 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Gemini 1.5 Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.80s compared with 1.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Gemini 1.5 Pro has a larger context window, supporting 2M tokens compared with 200K tokens.
निष्कर्ष
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro if your priority is Massive codebase migration, 1-hour video understanding, financial report libraries, and audio analysis. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Claude 3 Opus if your workflow prioritizes Executive strategy briefs, high-end creative writing, philosophical research, and nuanced legal evaluation. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न (FAQ)
How does Gemini 1.5 Pro compare to Claude 3 Opus in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Gemini 1.5 Pro costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $5.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the more cost-effective model for high-volume API pipelines. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Claude 3 Opus?+
Gemini 1.5 Pro supports a context window of 2,000K tokens (~1,500k words), while Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens (~150k words). Therefore, Gemini 1.5 Pro can process more textual data and document context in a single prompt.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Gemini 1.5 Pro or Claude 3 Opus?+
Gemini 1.5 Pro scores 32.5% on SWE-bench Verified while Claude 3 Opus scores 32.2%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Gemini 1.5 Pro holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus?+
Gemini 1.5 Pro is optimized for low-latency direct generation. In contrast, Claude 3 Opus focuses on standard fast inference.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus?+
Gemini 1.5 Pro generates approximately 65 tokens per second, while Claude 3 Opus delivers 30 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Gemini 1.5 Pro provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus to optimize costs?+
Yes! High-efficiency architectures route high-frequency routine classification and conversational tasks to Gemini 1.5 Pro to save operational costs, and dynamically escalate complex architectural queries or reasoning tasks to Claude 3 Opus. This tiered routing pattern cuts overall API bills by up to 70%.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3 Opus: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonतुलना
- Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-4: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonतुलना
- GPT-4o vs Gemini 1.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonतुलना
- Qwen-VL Plus vs Claude 3 Opus: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonतुलना
- Sonar vs Gemini 1.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonतुलना
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonतुलना
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
स्रोत: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs