Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado por el equipo de investigación de GetInfoUsÚltima revisión: October 2026Política editorial

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Llama 5Profile

Qwen3.8 Max PreviewProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Llama 5

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Llama 5 de Meta es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 5M, velocidad de 65 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 94/100 y tarifa de ac

Intelligence Index94 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Alibaba

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Modelo Base de Pesos Abiertos

Qwen3.8 Max Preview de Alibaba es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 1M, velocidad de 60 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 93/100

Intelligence Index93 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

75.2%

Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 1M tokens).
Llama 5 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 60 tok/s.
Qwen3.8 Max Preview leads on SWE-bench coding (75.2% vs 74.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Característica	Llama 5	Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	94	93
Provider	Meta	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	32K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	65 tok/s	60 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	74%	75.2%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	84%	79.5%

¿Quién gana en cada área?

At-a-glance decision framework

Código

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

+1.2% SWE-bench lead

Costo

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Velocidad

Llama 5

+8% faster generation

Contexto

Llama 5

5M tokens window

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 5Qwen3.8 Max Preview

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

74%vs75.2%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

84%vs79.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

87%vs89%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1485ptsvs1485pts

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vs77%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

88%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs60 tok/s

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Llama 50.85s

Qwen3.8 Max Preview0.68s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Llama 58.54s

Qwen3.8 Max Preview9.01s

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Llama 5 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Qwen3.8 Max Preview Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Ventana de contexto de 5M con hasta 128K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
Rendimiento ágil de 65 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 850 ms
Pesos abiertos (600B+ total (~40-80B )) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

Ventana de contexto de 1M con hasta 32K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 75.2% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
Rendimiento ágil de 60 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 680 ms
Pesos abiertos (2.4T total (95B MoE)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
En demostraciones científicas extremas, los modelos de razonamiento pesado de gama alta ofrecen mayor profundidad

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Llama 5	Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	40K	35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	20K	15K

Especificaciones Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 5 or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 5 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 60 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.68s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Veredicto

Tanto Llama 5 (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Qwen3.8 Max Preview (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Llama 5 lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Llama 5 ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Llama 5 resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Llama 5 o Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Llama 5 obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.

¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Llama 5 frente a Qwen3.8 Max Preview?+

Llama 5 cuesta $0.00 / $0.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Qwen3.8 Max Preview cuesta $0.00 / $0.00. En costo combinado, Llama 5 es la opción más económica.

¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+

Llama 5 cuenta con 5M tokens de contexto frente a 1M tokens de Qwen3.8 Max Preview. En velocidad de inferencia, Llama 5 ofrece un rendimiento superior.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Característica	Llama 5	Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Official API Model ID (SDK)	meta-llama/Llama-5	qwen3-8-max-preview-instruct
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-04	2026-07
Knowledge Cutoff	January 2026	April 2026
Architecture	Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)	Colossus-Scale Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters	600B+ total (~40-80B active)	2.4T total (95B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1488 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 5160 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision, video, audio	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo

Llama 5

Qwen3.8 Max Preview

¿Quién gana en cada área?

Puntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas

Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta

Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Qwen3.8 Max Preview · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Especificaciones Técnicas

Llama 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)

Veredicto

Preguntas frecuentes

Related reading