Command A Plus vs Command A Reasoning
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Command A Plus de Cohere y Command A Reasoning de Cohere compiten directamente en el ecosistema actual de IA. Command A Plus ofrece una ventana de contexto de 128K tokens a $3.00/$12.00 por millón de tokens (entrada/salida), mientras que Command A Reasoning ofrece 256K tokens de contexto a $2.50/$10.00 por millón de tokens. Analizamos sus benchmarks, latencia y costos reales.
Cambia y Compara Cualquier Modelo
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Command A Plus
Modelo Base de Pesos AbiertosCommand A Plus de Cohere es un modelo de IA diseñado para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, con ventana de contexto de 128K, velocidad de 68 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 58/100 y t
$3.00 / 1M
$12.00 / 1M
128K tokens
60.5%
Command A Reasoning
Razonamiento de Pesos AbiertosCommand A Reasoning de Cohere es un modelo de IA diseñado para razonamiento de cadena de pensamiento con pesos abiertos y alta eficiencia algorítmica, con ventana de contexto de 256K, velocidad de 55 tokens/s, índice de inteligencia de 55/1
$2.50 / 1M
$10.00 / 1M
256K tokens
53%
Diferencias Clave de un Vistazo
- Command A Reasoning is 1.2x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Command A Reasoning has a larger context window (256K vs 128K tokens).
- Command A Plus is faster at 68 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
- Command A Plus leads on SWE-bench coding (60.5% vs 53.0%).
| Característica | Command A Plus | Command A Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 58 | 55 |
Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $3.00 / 1M | $2.50 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $12.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $2.33 / 1M | $2.02 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text | 256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 33K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 68 tok/s | 55 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 60.5% | 53% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 74% | 70% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.75 / 1M | $0.75 / 1M |
¿Quién gana en cada área?
At-a-glance decision frameworkPuntuaciones de Benchmarks Verificadas
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latencia y Tiempo de Respuesta
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Simulador Interactivo de Costos de Tokens
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Command A Plus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Ventana de contexto de 128K con hasta 33K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 60.5% · GPQA Diamond 74%)
- Rendimiento ágil de 68 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 560 ms
- Pesos abiertos (Confidential (~180B+ MoE)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
- En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos
Command A Reasoning · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Ventana de contexto de 256K con hasta 33K tokens de salida máxima (SWE-bench Verified 53% · GPQA Diamond 70%)
- Rendimiento ágil de 55 tokens/segundo con latencia inicial (TTFT) de solo 750 ms
- Pesos abiertos (Confidential (~100B+)) listos para autoalojamiento local o en nube privada mediante vLLM y Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Requiere infraestructura GPU dedicada con suficiente memoria VRAM para inferencia local sin cuantización
- En volúmenes masivos de tokens, se recomienda activar el caché de prompts y Batch API para optimizar costos
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Command A Plus | Command A Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.85 | $0.95 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 45K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 22K | 22K |
Especificaciones Técnicas
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Característica | Command A Plus | Command A Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | command-a-plus | command-a-reasoning |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2025-08 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | March 2026 | June 2025 |
| Architecture | Flagship Multimodal Agentic MoE | Enterprise Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential (~180B+ MoE) | Confidential (~100B+) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($3/1M in) across full 128K window | Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 256K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Cached input at $0.75/1M tokens | Cached input at $0.75/1M tokens |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 112 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 387 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 62 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 215 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Command A Plus vs Command A Reasoning: Respuestas Rápidas (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Command A Plus or Command A Reasoning?
Command A Plus is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 55 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Command A Plus is faster, generating 68 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Command A Reasoning is cheaper at $2.02 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.33 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Command A Plus has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.56s compared with 0.75s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Command A Reasoning has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Veredicto
Tanto Command A Plus (Ideal para autoalojamiento en servidores propios, ajuste fino (fine-tuning) y soberanía de datos, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) como Command A Reasoning (Ideal para razonamiento de cadena de pensamiento con pesos abiertos y alta eficiencia algorítmica, sistemas RAG empresariales y automatización mediante API.) destacan en producción: Command A Plus lidera en inteligencia general y programación, Command A Plus ofrece mayor velocidad de generación de tokens y Command A Reasoning resulta más rentable para cargas de trabajo API de alto volumen.
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Cuál es mejor para programación y razonamiento, Command A Plus o Command A Reasoning?+
En las pruebas de inteligencia compuesta y resolución de código, Command A Plus obtiene la ventaja. Puedes revisar la tabla SWE-bench y GPQA arriba para comparar cada métrica.
¿Cuánto cuesta la API de Command A Plus frente a Command A Reasoning?+
Command A Plus cuesta $3.00 / $12.00 por millón de tokens de entrada/salida, mientras que Command A Reasoning cuesta $2.50 / $10.00. En costo combinado, Command A Reasoning es la opción más económica.
¿Qué modelo tiene mayor ventana de contexto y menor latencia?+
Command A Plus cuenta con 128K tokens de contexto frente a 256K tokens de Command A Reasoning. En velocidad de inferencia, Command A Plus ofrece un rendimiento superior.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Command A Plus vs. Claude Opus 5.5: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Command A Plus vs. Command A: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Command A Plus vs. Gemini 4 Argon: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Command A Plus vs. GPT-6 Astra: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Command A Plus vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
- Command A Reasoning vs. o3: Comparativa de Benchmarks, Precios API y Velocidad (2026)Comparar
Las puntuaciones de benchmarks, precios por token y límites de tasa evolucionan rápidamente. Verifique siempre las especificaciones actuales en la documentación oficial del proveedor.
Fuentes: Documentación oficial de API de Cohere y Cohere, tarjetas de sistema y benchmarks independientes (2026).