Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Falcon 3 180B vs Command R7B

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Geprüft vom GetInfoUs-ForschungsteamZuletzt geprüft: October 2026Redaktionelle Richtlinien

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Falcon 3 180BProfile

Command R7BProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

TII

Falcon 3 180B

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Falcon 3 180B von TII ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 33K Kontextfenster, 50 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 78/100 und kostenlosem Open-Weights-Zugang.

Intelligence Index78 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Cohere

Command R7B

Open-Weights-Basismodell

Command R7B von Cohere ist ein KI-Modell für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität mit 128K Kontextfenster, 140 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 38/100 und $0.07/$0.2 pro 1M Token.

Intelligence Index38 / 100

Input Token:

$0.07 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.20 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

27%

Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick

Falcon 3 180B is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Command R7B has a larger context window (128K vs 33K tokens).
Command R7B is faster at 140 tok/s vs 50 tok/s.

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Falcon 3 180B	Command R7B
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	78	38
Provider	TII	Cohere
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.07 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.20 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.05 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	4K	4K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	50 tok/s	140 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	N/A	27%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	54%	42.5%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.02 / 1M

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost

Falcon 3 180B

1.0x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Command R7B

+180% faster generation

Context

Command R7B

128K tokens window

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Falcon 3 180BCommand R7B

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

N/Avs27%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

54%vs42.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

76%vs66%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1280ptsvs1215pts

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs68%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

50 tok/s vs140 tok/s

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Falcon 3 180B0.71s

Command R7B0.29s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Falcon 3 180B10.71s

Command R7B3.86s

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Falcon 3 180B Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Command R7B Monthly API Bill

$0.32 / month

$0.07/1M in · $0.2/1M out

Falcon 3 180B saves approximately $0.32 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Falcon 3 180B · Strengths & Key Advantages

33K Kontextfenster und bis zu 4K maximale Output-Token (GPQA Diamond 54% · MMLU-Pro 76%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 50 Token/Sekunde bei nur 710 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Offene Modellgewichte (180B) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Command R7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

128K Kontextfenster und bis zu 4K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 27% · GPQA Diamond 42.5%)
Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 140 Token/Sekunde bei nur 290 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
Offene Modellgewichte (7B) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama

Considerations & Trade-offs

Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Falcon 3 180B	Command R7B
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.05
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	15K	20K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Technische Spezifikationen

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Falcon 3 180B	Command R7B
Official API Model ID (SDK)	falcon-3-180b	command-r7b
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2024-12	2024-12
Knowledge Cutoff	September 2024	October 2024
Architecture	High-Scale Dense Open Transformer	Efficient Compact RAG Transformer
Parameters	180B	7B
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Flat rate ($0.07/1M in) across full 128K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Cached input at $0.02/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 112 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 387 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 4 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 15 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Falcon 3 180B vs Command R7B: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Falcon 3 180B or Command R7B?

Falcon 3 180B is more intelligent. It scores 78 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Command R7B is faster, generating 140 tokens per second compared with 50 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Falcon 3 180B is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.05 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Command R7B has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.29s compared with 0.71s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Command R7B has a larger context window, supporting 128K tokens compared with 32.8K tokens.

Fazit

Sowohl Falcon 3 180B (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch Command R7B (Optimal für Self-Hosting im eigenen Rechenzentrum, Fine-Tuning und volle Datensouveränität, Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: Falcon 3 180B führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, Command R7B liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und Falcon 3 180B ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – Falcon 3 180B oder Command R7B?+

Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt Falcon 3 180B vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.

Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von Falcon 3 180B und Command R7B?+

Falcon 3 180B kostet $0.00 / $0.00 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, Command R7B liegt bei $0.07 / $0.20. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist Falcon 3 180B günstiger.

Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+

Falcon 3 180B bietet 32.8K Tokens Kontext gegenüber 128K Tokens bei Command R7B. Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt Command R7B vorn.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Falcon 3 180B vs Command R7B

Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen

Falcon 3 180B

Command R7B

Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?

Geprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich

Latenz & Antwortzeit

Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator

Falcon 3 180B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Command R7B · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Technische Spezifikationen

Falcon 3 180B vs Command R7B: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)

Fazit

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

Related reading