DeepSeek Reasoner vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
DeepSeek Reasoner von DeepSeek und DeepSeek-R1-0528 von DeepSeek gehören zu den führenden KI-Modellen. DeepSeek Reasoner bietet ein Kontextfenster von 1M Tokens bei API-Preisen von $0.28/$0.42 pro 1M Tokens, während DeepSeek-R1-0528 128K Tokens Kontext zu $0.55/$2.19 pro 1M Tokens bereitstellt. Hier finden Sie den vollständigen Benchmark-, Latenz- und Kostenvergleich.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
DeepSeek Reasoner
Open-Weights-Reasoning-ModellDeepSeek Reasoner von DeepSeek ist ein KI-Modell für Open-Weights-Reasoning mit transparenter Gedankenketten-Verarbeitung (Chain-of-Thought) mit 1M Kontextfenster, 52 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 54/100 und $0.28/$0.42 pro
$0.28 / 1M
$0.42 / 1M
1M tokens
56.5%
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Open-Weights-Reasoning-ModellDeepSeek-R1-0528 von DeepSeek ist ein KI-Modell für Open-Weights-Reasoning mit transparenter Gedankenketten-Verarbeitung (Chain-of-Thought) mit 128K Kontextfenster, 48 Token/s Durchsatz, einem Intelligenz-Index von 52/100 und $0.55/$2.19 pr
$0.55 / 1M
$2.19 / 1M
128K tokens
51.8%
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- DeepSeek Reasoner is 3.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- DeepSeek Reasoner has a larger context window (1M vs 128K tokens).
- DeepSeek Reasoner is faster at 52 tok/s vs 48 tok/s.
- DeepSeek Reasoner leads on SWE-bench coding (56.5% vs 51.8%).
| Feature | DeepSeek Reasoner | DeepSeek-R1-0528 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 54 | 52 |
Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.28 / 1M | $0.55 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.42 / 1M | $2.19 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.12 / 1M | $0.43 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text | 128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 33K | 8K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 52 tok/s | 48 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 56.5% | 51.8% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 76.5% | 74.2% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.03 / 1M | $0.14 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkGeprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
DeepSeek Reasoner · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1M Kontextfenster und bis zu 33K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 56.5% · GPQA Diamond 76.5%)
- Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 52 Token/Sekunde bei nur 820 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
- Offene Modellgewichte (671B Total (37B )) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
- Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen
DeepSeek-R1-0528 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 128K Kontextfenster und bis zu 8K maximale Output-Token (SWE-bench Verified 51.8% · GPQA Diamond 74.2%)
- Hohe Generierungsgeschwindigkeit von 48 Token/Sekunde bei nur 900 ms Erstlatenz (TTFT)
- Offene Modellgewichte (671B (37B MoE)) für lokales Self-Hosting und Fine-Tuning über vLLM, SGLang oder Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Erfordert dedizierte GPU-Hardware mit ausreichend VRAM für den lokalen Betrieb in voller Präzision
- Bei extrem komplexen mehrstufigen Forschungsfragen bieten schwere Reasoning-Spezialmodelle noch tiefere Analysen
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | DeepSeek Reasoner | DeepSeek-R1-0528 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.22 | $0.62 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 45K | 45K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 26K | 25K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | DeepSeek Reasoner | DeepSeek-R1-0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | deepseek-reasoner | deepseek-reasoner |
| API Protocol | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-12 | 2025-05 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2025 | March 2025 |
| Architecture | Reinforcement-Learned Reasoning MoE | Open-Weights Reasoning MoE |
| Parameters | 671B Total (37B Active) | 671B (37B active MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.28/1M in) across full 1000K window | Flat rate ($0.55/1M in) across full 128K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.028/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix caching at $0.14/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) | API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 416 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1443 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
DeepSeek Reasoner vs DeepSeek-R1-0528: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, DeepSeek Reasoner or DeepSeek-R1-0528?
DeepSeek Reasoner is more intelligent. It scores 54 compared with 52 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
DeepSeek Reasoner is faster, generating 52 tokens per second compared with 48 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
DeepSeek Reasoner is cheaper at $0.12 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.43 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
DeepSeek Reasoner has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.82s compared with 0.90s.
Which model has a larger context window?
DeepSeek Reasoner has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 128K tokens.
Fazit
Sowohl DeepSeek Reasoner (Optimal für Open-Weights-Reasoning mit transparenter Gedankenketten-Verarbeitung (Chain-of-Thought), Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) als auch DeepSeek-R1-0528 (Optimal für Open-Weights-Reasoning mit transparenter Gedankenketten-Verarbeitung (Chain-of-Thought), Enterprise-RAG-Systeme und skalierbare API-Pipelines.) überzeugen im Produktionseinsatz: DeepSeek Reasoner führt bei komplexem Reasoning und Coding, DeepSeek Reasoner liefert den höheren Token-Durchsatz und DeepSeek Reasoner ist die kosteneffizienteste Wahl für große API-Workloads.
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
Welches Modell ist besser für Coding und Reasoning – DeepSeek Reasoner oder DeepSeek-R1-0528?+
Im Gesamt-Intelligenzindex und bei Software-Benchmarks liegt DeepSeek Reasoner vorn. Prüfen Sie oben die SWE-bench- und GPQA-Werte für Ihren Anwendungsfall.
Wie unterscheiden sich die API-Preise von DeepSeek Reasoner und DeepSeek-R1-0528?+
DeepSeek Reasoner kostet $0.28 / $0.42 pro 1M Input-/Output-Tokens, DeepSeek-R1-0528 liegt bei $0.55 / $2.19. Beim gewichteten Gesamtpreis ist DeepSeek Reasoner günstiger.
Welches Modell hat das größere Kontextfenster und die höhere Geschwindigkeit?+
DeepSeek Reasoner bietet 1M Tokens Kontext gegenüber 128K Tokens bei DeepSeek-R1-0528. Bei der Generierungsgeschwindigkeit liegt DeepSeek Reasoner vorn.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- DeepSeek Reasoner vs. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- DeepSeek V4 vs. DeepSeek Reasoner: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B vs. DeepSeek-R1-0528: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- o3 vs. DeepSeek-R1-0528: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aion-3.0 vs. Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
- Aion-3.0 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, API-Preise & Geschwindigkeit im Vergleich (2026)Vergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: Offizielle API-Dokumentation von DeepSeek und DeepSeek, Systemkarten und unabhängige Benchmark-Auswertungen (2026).