Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (12)
Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic and Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic represent two of the frontier AI models analyzed in our comprehensive 2026 AI benchmark and LLM comparison. In this head-to-head evaluation, we examine API token pricing, context window specifications, inference speed (tokens per second), and empirical reasoning performance. From a pure economic perspective, both models offer identical input token rates. On output generation, costs are matched. In data-heavy architectures requiring extensive repository or document analysis, both models provide an identical memory horizon with 1,000K tokens. In latency-sensitive production environments, Claude Opus 4.8 leads in tokens-per-second throughput, making it ideal for real-time conversational agents and high-concurrency workflows. Below is the complete empirical head-to-head breakdown across cost, speed, context, and capability matrices.
Beliebige Modelle wechseln & vergleichen
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Claude Opus 4.8
Deep-Reasoning-ModellClaude Opus 4.8 von Anthropic ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 1M Token zu API-Preisen von $5/1M Input- und $25/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$5.00 / 1M
$25.00 / 1M
1M tokens
80.8%
Claude Opus 4.7
Deep-Reasoning-ModellClaude Opus 4.7 von Anthropic ist ein leistungsstarkes KI-Modell mit einem Kontextfenster von 1M Token zu API-Preisen von $5/1M Input- und $25/1M Output-Token für Softwareentwicklung, Analyse und Enterprise-Workflows.
$5.00 / 1M
$25.00 / 1M
1M tokens
79.5%
Wichtigste Unterschiede auf einen Blick
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 64 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
- Claude Opus 4.8 leads on SWE-bench coding (80.8% vs 79.5%).
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 67 | 66 |
Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $5.00 / 1M | $5.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $25.00 / 1M | $25.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $3.85 / 1M | $3.85 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text | 1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 128K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 64 tok/s | 58 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 80.8% | 79.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 78.9% | 77.8% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.50 / 1M |
Wer gewinnt in welcher Disziplin?
At-a-glance decision frameworkGeprüfte Benchmark-Ergebnisse im Vergleich
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Latenz & Antwortzeit
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Interaktiver Token-Kosten-Simulator
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude Opus 4.8 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Frontier Hybrid Cognitive Architecture-Architektur von Anthropic mit 1M Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($5/1M Input, $25/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Claude Opus 4.7 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Fortschrittliche Adaptive Enterprise Reasoning Transformer-Architektur von Anthropic mit 1M Token Kontextfenster
- Starkes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ($5/1M Input, $25/1M Output) bei hoher Durchsatzrate
- Hohe Präzision bei Code-Generierung, logischem Schließen und mehrsprachigen Benchmarks
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Bei sehr großen Kontextmengen ist eine sorgfältige Token-Budgetierung ratsam
- Spezialisierte Fachaufgaben profitieren von gezieltem Prompt-Engineering
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $5.49 | $5.49 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 72K | 72K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 37K | 37K |
Technische Spezifikationen
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-opus-4-8-20260501 | claude-opus-4-7-20260401 |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | March 2026 | February 2026 |
| Architecture | Frontier Hybrid Cognitive Architecture | Adaptive Enterprise Reasoning Transformer |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | $0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Schnelle Antworten (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.8 is more intelligent. It scores 67 compared with 66 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
Claude Opus 4.8 is faster, generating 64 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
Claude Opus 4.8 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.65s compared with 1.85s.
Fazit
Verdict & Model Selection Recommendation: Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if your priority is Frontier AI research, multi-agent systems orchestration, and enterprise software engineering. Its performance in demanding tasks justifies its operational token cost. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if your workflow prioritizes Autonomous software testing suites, cybersecurity code analysis, and complex refactors. For large-scale batch processing or customer-facing conversational interfaces, its balance of speed and economics delivers superior ROI.
Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
How does Claude Opus 4.8 compare to Claude Opus 4.7 in API token pricing and cost per token?+
Both Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 4.7 share matched API token pricing at $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output tokens. Because their token economics are identical, your selection should be guided by benchmark latency, memory horizon, and reasoning capabilities rather than operational token fees. Both models support prompt caching discounts of up to 90% for repeated prompt prefixes.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Both Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 4.7 offer an identical context window of 1,000K tokens (~750k words). Both architectures provide equal capacity for large document ingestion, multi-file codebases, and extended multi-turn conversation histories.
Which AI model is better for software engineering and coding: Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Claude Opus 4.8 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified while Claude Opus 4.7 scores 79.5%. For autonomous software engineering and multi-file debugging, Claude Opus 4.8 holds the verified benchmark lead.
What is the difference in reasoning capability and extended thinking between Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 4.7?+
Claude Opus 4.8 features native chain-of-thought extended thinking mode with configurable reasoning effort. In contrast, Claude Opus 4.7 provides chain-of-thought reasoning depth for complex math and science.
How does inference speed (tokens per second) compare between Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 4.7?+
Claude Opus 4.8 generates approximately 64 tokens per second, while Claude Opus 4.7 delivers 58 tokens per second. In latency-sensitive production environments, Claude Opus 4.8 provides faster time-to-first-token (TTFT) and higher streaming response velocity.
Can you implement a tiered LLM routing setup combining Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 4.7 to optimize costs?+
Yes! Tiered multi-model routing can optimize for latency and accuracy: you can route high-frequency conversational turns and latency-sensitive queries to Claude Opus 4.8, and route deep architectural or complex reasoning queries to Claude Opus 4.8. This balanced routing strategy maximizes system throughput and answer quality.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.6: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 Instant: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- GPT-5.2 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Hunyuan Large V2 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
- Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonVergleich
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Offizielle Quellen: GetInfoUs Independent AI Benchmarks & Official API Specs