Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Astra
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic against GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
بدّل وقارن بين أي نموذجين
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
Claude 3 Opus
نموذج رائد متقدمنموذج Claude 3 Opus المقدم من Anthropic يوفر نافذة سياق تصل إلى 200K رمز، بتكلفة $15 لكل مليون رمز إدخال و$75 لكل مليون رمز إخراج، ومصمم للبرمجة والاستدلال وتطبيقات الأعمال.
$15.00 / 1M
$75.00 / 1M
200K tokens
32.2%
GPT-6 Astra
نموذج استدلال عميقنموذج GPT-6 Astra المقدم من OpenAI يوفر نافذة سياق تصل إلى 1M رمز، بتكلفة $10.0 لكل مليون رمز إدخال و$50.0 لكل مليون رمز إخراج، ومصمم للبرمجة والاستدلال وتطبيقات الأعمال.
$10.00 / 1M
$50.00 / 1M
272K tokens
82.4%
أهم الفروقات في لمحة
- GPT-6 Astra is 1.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window (272K vs 200K tokens).
- GPT-6 Astra is faster at 100 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
- GPT-6 Astra leads on SWE-bench coding (82.4% vs 32.2%).
| Feature | Claude 3 Opus | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 44 | 96 |
Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $15.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $75.00 / 1M | $50.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $11.55 / 1M | $7.70 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 4K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 30 tok/s | 100 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 32.2% | 82.4% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 50.4% | 80.9% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $1.50 / 1M | $1.00 / 1M |
من يتفوق في كل مجال؟
At-a-glance decision frameworkنتائج الاختبارات المعيارية الموثقة
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
زمن الاستجابة والسرعة
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
محاكي تكلفة الرموز التفاعلي
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
Claude 3 Opus · Strengths & Key Advantages
- بنية Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer متطورة من Anthropic مع سعة سياق تبلغ 200K رمز
- كفاءة عالية في التكلفة ($15/1M إدخال و$75/1M إخراج) وسرعة استجابة ممتازة
- أداء قوي في اختبارات البرمجة، الاستدلال المنطقي، ودعم اللغات المتعددة
Considerations & Trade-offs
- يتطلب إدارة دقيقة لاستهلاك الرموز عند استخدام نافذة السياق الكاملة
- قد يحتاج إلى ضبط دقيق للتعليمات (Prompt Engineering) في المهام التخصصية المعقدة
GPT-6 Astra · Strengths & Key Advantages
- بنية Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT متطورة من OpenAI مع سعة سياق تبلغ 1M رمز
- كفاءة عالية في التكلفة ($10.0/1M إدخال و$50.0/1M إخراج) وسرعة استجابة ممتازة
- أداء قوي في اختبارات البرمجة، الاستدلال المنطقي، ودعم اللغات المتعددة
Considerations & Trade-offs
- يتطلب إدارة دقيقة لاستهلاك الرموز عند استخدام نافذة السياق الكاملة
- قد يحتاج إلى ضبط دقيق للتعليمات (Prompt Engineering) في المهام التخصصية المعقدة
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | Claude 3 Opus | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.20 | $2.15 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 58K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 32K |
المواصفات التقنية
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | Claude 3 Opus | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | claude-3-opus-20240301 | gpt-6-astra |
| API Protocol | Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 |
| Release Date | 2024-03 | 2026-09 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 2023 | June 2026 |
| Architecture | Frontier Dense Multimodal Transformer | Omni-Adaptive Autoregressive with Dynamic CoT |
| Parameters | Confidential | Confidential |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens | Flat rate ($10/1M in) across full 272K window |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | $1.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $1/1M (no extra cache-write fee) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text, audio |
Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-6 Astra: إجابات سريعة (FAQ)
Which is more intelligent, Claude 3 Opus or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra is more intelligent. It scores 96 compared with 44 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-6 Astra is faster, generating 100 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
GPT-6 Astra is cheaper at $7.70 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $11.55 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-6 Astra has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.95s compared with 1.20s.
Which model has a larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra has a larger context window, supporting 272K tokens compared with 200K tokens.
الحكم النهائي
Choose Claude 3 Opus for أتمتة الأعمال، تطوير البرمجيات، الوكلاء الأذكياء (ai agents)، وتطبيقات anthropic الإنتاجية, or choose GPT-6 Astra for أتمتة الأعمال، تطوير البرمجيات، الوكلاء الأذكياء (ai agents)، وتطبيقات openai الإنتاجية.
الأسئلة الشائعة (FAQ)
Which is cheaper: Claude 3 Opus or GPT-6 Astra?+
Claude 3 Opus costs $15/1M input and $75/1M output tokens, while GPT-6 Astra costs $10/1M input and $50/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: Claude 3 Opus or GPT-6 Astra?+
Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens whereas GPT-6 Astra supports 272K tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparisonمقارنة
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
المصادر الرسمية: Anthropic & OpenAI Official Documentation