o4-mini-deep-research vs Kimi K3
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare o4-mini-deep-research by OpenAI against Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
o4-mini-deep-research
Derin Akıl Yürütme ModeliOpenAI tarafından geliştirilen o4-mini-deep-research, 200K token bağlam penceresi ve 1M girdi başına $2, 1M çıktı başına $8 API fiyatlandırmasıyla yazılım geliştirme, analiz ve kurumsal otomasyon için tasarlanmıştır.
$2.00 / 1M
$8.00 / 1M
200K tokens
48.5%
Kimi K3
Açık Ağırlıklı ModelMoonshot AI tarafından geliştirilen Kimi K3, 1.0M token bağlam penceresi ve 1M girdi başına $0, 1M çıktı başına $0 API fiyatlandırmasıyla yazılım geliştirme, analiz ve kurumsal otomasyon için tasarlanmıştır.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
1.05M tokens
74.5%
Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar
- Kimi K3 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Kimi K3 has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
- o4-mini-deep-research is faster at 70 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
- Kimi K3 leads on SWE-bench coding (74.5% vs 48.5%).
| Feature | o4-mini-deep-research | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 48 | 93 |
Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $2.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $8.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $1.55 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 100K | 131K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 70 tok/s | 58 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 48.5% | 74.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 68% | 79% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.50 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?
At-a-glance decision frameworkDoğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
o4-mini-deep-research · Strengths & Key Advantages
- OpenAI imzalı gelişmiş Compact agentic reasoning transformer mimarisi ve 200K token bağlam kapasitesi
- Dengeli API maliyeti ($2/1M girdi, $8/1M çıktı) ve yüksek yanıt hızı
- Kod üretimi, mantıksal çıkarım ve çok dilli görevlerde güçlü kıyaslama (benchmark) sonuçları
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Çok uzun bağlamlı sorgularda token maliyetlerinin dikkatli yönetilmesi gerekir
- Alan bazlı özel iş akışlarında en yüksek verim için doğru istem (prompt) tasarımı önerilir
Kimi K3 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Moonshot AI imzalı gelişmiş Colossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts mimarisi ve 1.0M token bağlam kapasitesi
- Dengeli API maliyeti ($0/1M girdi, $0/1M çıktı) ve yüksek yanıt hızı
- Kod üretimi, mantıksal çıkarım ve çok dilli görevlerde güçlü kıyaslama (benchmark) sonuçları
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Çok uzun bağlamlı sorgularda token maliyetlerinin dikkatli yönetilmesi gerekir
- Alan bazlı özel iş akışlarında en yüksek verim için doğru istem (prompt) tasarımı önerilir
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | o4-mini-deep-research | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $1.10 | $2.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 75K | 35K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 30K | 18K |
Teknik Özellikler
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | o4-mini-deep-research | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | o4-mini-deep-research | kimi-k3 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2025-06 | 2026-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | June 2024 | March 2026 |
| Architecture | Compact agentic reasoning transformer | Colossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | Confidential | 2.8T total (MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 200K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.5/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1736 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 6020 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
o4-mini-deep-research vs Kimi K3: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)
Which is more intelligent, o4-mini-deep-research or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 48 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
o4-mini-deep-research is faster, generating 70 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Kimi K3 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.55 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
Kimi K3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.72s compared with 2.40s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Kimi K3 has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 200K tokens.
Sonuç
Choose o4-mini-deep-research for kurumsal otomasyon, yazılım mühendisliği, otonom yz ajanları ve openai tabanlı üretim sistemleri, or choose Kimi K3 for kurumsal otomasyon, yazılım mühendisliği, otonom yz ajanları ve moonshot ai tabanlı üretim sistemleri.
Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)
Which is cheaper: o4-mini-deep-research or Kimi K3?+
o4-mini-deep-research costs $2/1M input and $8/1M output tokens, while Kimi K3 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: o4-mini-deep-research or Kimi K3?+
o4-mini-deep-research supports 200K tokens whereas Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Resmi kaynaklar: OpenAI & Moonshot AI Official Documentation