Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Llama 5 vs Kimi K3

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri

Paylaş

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Llama 5Profile

Kimi K3Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Llama 5

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

Meta tarafından geliştirilen Llama 5; özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 5M bağlam penceresi, 65 token/sn hız, 94/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık erişimi s

Intelligence Index94 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3

Açık Ağırlıklı Akıl Yürütme

Moonshot AI tarafından geliştirilen Kimi K3; yüksek verimli açık ağırlıklı düşünce zinciri (Chain-of-Thought) akıl yürütme için tasarlanmış olup 1.0M bağlam penceresi, 58 token/sn hız, 93/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık erişimi su

Intelligence Index93 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.5%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 1M tokens).
Llama 5 is faster at 65 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
Kimi K3 leads on SWE-bench coding (74.5% vs 74.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Llama 5	Kimi K3
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	94	93
Provider	Meta	Moonshot AI
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text	1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	131K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	65 tok/s	58 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	74%	74.5%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	84%	79%

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Kimi K3

+0.5% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Llama 5

+12% faster generation

Context

Llama 5

5M tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Llama 5Kimi K3

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

74%vs74.5%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

84%vs79%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

87%vs88.8%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1485ptsvs1480pts

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vsN/A

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

88%vsN/A

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs58 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Llama 50.85s

Kimi K30.72s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Llama 58.54s

Kimi K39.34s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Llama 5 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Kimi K3 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

5M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 128K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
Sadece 850 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 65 token yüksek üretim hızı
vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (600B+ total (~40-80B ))

Considerations & Trade-offs

Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Kimi K3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

1.0M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 131K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 74.5% · GPQA Diamond 79%)
Sadece 720 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 58 token yüksek üretim hızı
vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (2.8T total (MoE))

Considerations & Trade-offs

Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Llama 5	Kimi K3
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$2.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	40K	35K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	20K	18K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Llama 5 vs Kimi K3: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which is more intelligent, Llama 5 or Kimi K3?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 93 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Llama 5 is faster, generating 65 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Kimi K3 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.72s compared with 0.85s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 1.05M tokens.

Sonuç

Hem Llama 5 (özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) hem de Kimi K3 (yüksek verimli açık ağırlıklı düşünce zinciri (Chain-of-Thought) akıl yürütme, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) güçlü üretim seçenekleridir: Llama 5 karmaşık akıl yürütme ve kodlama testlerinde öne çıkarken, Llama 5 daha yüksek üretim hızı sağlar; Llama 5 ise yüksek hacimli API kullanımlarında daha ekonomiktir.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Kodlama ve akıl yürütme için Llama 5 mi yoksa Kimi K3 mi daha iyi?+

Bileşik zeka endeksi ve yazılım testlerinde Llama 5 önde yer alıyor. Detaylı karşılaştırma için yukarıdaki SWE-bench ve GPQA tablolarına göz atabilirsiniz.

Llama 5 ve Kimi K3 API fiyatları nasıl karşılaştırılır?+

Llama 5 1M giriş/çıkış tokeni başına $0.00 / $0.00 ücretlendirilirken, Kimi K3 $0.00 / $0.00 seviyesindedir. Karma maliyette Llama 5 daha avantajlıdır.

Hangi modelin bağlam penceresi daha geniş ve hızı daha yüksek?+

Llama 5 5M token bağlam penceresi sunarken Kimi K3 1.05M token kapasiteye sahiptir. Saniyedeki token üretim hızında ise Llama 5 öndedir.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Feature	Llama 5	Kimi K3
Official API Model ID (SDK)	meta-llama/Llama-5	kimi-k3
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2026-04	2026-07
Knowledge Cutoff	January 2026	March 2026
Architecture	Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)	Colossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters	600B+ total (~40-80B active)	2.8T total (MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1736 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 6020 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text, vision, video, audio	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Llama 5 vs Kimi K3

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Llama 5

Kimi K3

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Kimi K3 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Teknik Özellikler

Llama 5 vs Kimi K3: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Sonuç

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Related reading