GPT-5.5 Instant vs Llama 5
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare GPT-5.5 Instant by OpenAI against Llama 5 by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
GPT-5.5 Instant
Derin Akıl Yürütme ModeliOpenAI tarafından geliştirilen GPT-5.5 Instant, 400K token bağlam penceresi ve 1M girdi başına $0.75, 1M çıktı başına $6 API fiyatlandırmasıyla yazılım geliştirme, analiz ve kurumsal otomasyon için tasarlanmıştır.
$0.75 / 1M
$6.00 / 1M
400K tokens
74.5%
Llama 5
Açık Ağırlıklı ModelMeta tarafından geliştirilen Llama 5, 5M token bağlam penceresi ve 1M girdi başına $0, 1M çıktı başına $0 API fiyatlandırmasıyla yazılım geliştirme, analiz ve kurumsal otomasyon için tasarlanmıştır.
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
5M tokens
74%
Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar
- Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
- Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 400K tokens).
- GPT-5.5 Instant is faster at 168 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
- GPT-5.5 Instant leads on SWE-bench coding (74.5% vs 74.0%).
| Feature | GPT-5.5 Instant | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 65 | 94 |
Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.75 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $6.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.80 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 400K tokens~600 A4 pages of text | 5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 128K | 128K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 168 tok/s | 65 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | 74.5% | 74% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | 75% | 84% |
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens | $0.07 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?
At-a-glance decision frameworkDoğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.
Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.
Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.
Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.
Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-5.5 Instant · Strengths & Key Advantages
- OpenAI imzalı gelişmiş Low-latency compact reasoning model mimarisi ve 400K token bağlam kapasitesi
- Dengeli API maliyeti ($0.75/1M girdi, $6/1M çıktı) ve yüksek yanıt hızı
- Kod üretimi, mantıksal çıkarım ve çok dilli görevlerde güçlü kıyaslama (benchmark) sonuçları
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Çok uzun bağlamlı sorgularda token maliyetlerinin dikkatli yönetilmesi gerekir
- Alan bazlı özel iş akışlarında en yüksek verim için doğru istem (prompt) tasarımı önerilir
Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- Meta imzalı gelişmiş Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) mimarisi ve 5M token bağlam kapasitesi
- Dengeli API maliyeti ($0/1M girdi, $0/1M çıktı) ve yüksek yanıt hızı
- Kod üretimi, mantıksal çıkarım ve çok dilli görevlerde güçlü kıyaslama (benchmark) sonuçları
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Çok uzun bağlamlı sorgularda token maliyetlerinin dikkatli yönetilmesi gerekir
- Alan bazlı özel iş akışlarında en yüksek verim için doğru istem (prompt) tasarımı önerilir
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 Instant | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.95 | $0.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 52K | 40K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 26K | 20K |
Teknik Özellikler
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GPT-5.5 Instant | Llama 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-5-5-instant | meta-llama/Llama-5 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2026-05 | 2026-04 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | December 2025 | January 2026 |
| Architecture | Low-latency compact reasoning model | Mixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active) |
| Parameters | Confidential | 600B+ total (~40-80B active) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | 10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Flat rate ($0.75/1M in) across full 400K window | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix caching at $0.075/1M (no extra cache-write fee) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, video, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Llama 5: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-5.5 Instant or Llama 5?
Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 65 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-5.5 Instant is faster, generating 168 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.
Which model is cheaper to run?
Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.80 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-5.5 Instant has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.78s compared with 0.85s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 400K tokens.
Sonuç
Choose GPT-5.5 Instant for kurumsal otomasyon, yazılım mühendisliği, otonom yz ajanları ve openai tabanlı üretim sistemleri, or choose Llama 5 for kurumsal otomasyon, yazılım mühendisliği, otonom yz ajanları ve meta tabanlı üretim sistemleri.
Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)
Which is cheaper: GPT-5.5 Instant or Llama 5?+
GPT-5.5 Instant costs $0.75/1M input and $6/1M output tokens, while Llama 5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-5.5 Instant or Llama 5?+
GPT-5.5 Instant supports 400K tokens whereas Llama 5 supports 5M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed ComparisonKarşılaştır
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Resmi kaynaklar: OpenAI & Meta Official Documentation