GPT-1 vs Kimi K3
Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison
Related topics (4)
Compare GPT-1 by OpenAI against Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.
İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın
Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.
Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.
GPT-1
Açık Ağırlıklı Temel ModelOpenAI tarafından geliştirilen GPT-1; özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 1K bağlam penceresi, 150 token/sn hız, 5/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık erişimi s
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
512 tokens
N/A
Kimi K3
Açık Ağırlıklı Akıl YürütmeMoonshot AI tarafından geliştirilen Kimi K3; yüksek verimli açık ağırlıklı düşünce zinciri (Chain-of-Thought) akıl yürütme için tasarlanmış olup 1.0M bağlam penceresi, 58 token/sn hız, 93/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık erişimi su
$0.00 / 1M
$0.00 / 1M
1.05M tokens
74.5%
Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar
- Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
- Kimi K3 has a larger context window (1M vs 1K tokens).
- GPT-1 is faster at 150 tok/s vs 58 tok/s.
| Feature | GPT-1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100) | 5 | 93 |
Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
Input Price Cost per million input tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Output Price Cost per million output tokens | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M | $0.00 / 1M | $0.00 / 1M |
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens | 512 tokens~1 A4 pages of text | 1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text |
Max Output Tokens Per single request | 1K | 131K |
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second | 150 tok/s | 58 tok/s |
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering | N/A | 74.5% |
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning | N/A | 79% |
Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?
At-a-glance decision frameworkEvaluations ongoing
Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları
Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.
Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.
Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.
Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.
Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.
Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.
Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı
Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.
Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü
Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.
GPT-1 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 1K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (MMLU-Pro 8.5% · Arena Elo 600)
- Sadece 250 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 150 token yüksek üretim hızı
- vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (117M)
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
- Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir
Kimi K3 · Strengths & Key Advantages
- 1.0M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 131K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 74.5% · GPQA Diamond 79%)
- Sadece 720 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 58 token yüksek üretim hızı
- vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (2.8T total (MoE))
Considerations & Trade-offs
- Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
- Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir
Token Use & Task Economics
Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.
| Metric | GPT-1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task | $0.20 | $2.00 |
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task | 24K | 35K |
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task | 0K | 18K |
Teknik Özellikler
Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.
| Feature | GPT-1 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Official API Model ID (SDK) | gpt-1 | kimi-k3 |
| API Protocol | OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1 | OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI |
| Release Date | 2018-06 | 2026-07 |
| Knowledge Cutoff | 2018 | March 2026 |
| Architecture | 12-layer Decoder Transformer | Colossus-Scale Multimodal Sparse Mixture-of-Experts |
| Parameters | 117M | 2.8T total (MoE) |
| Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM) | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud | Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud |
| Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) | Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales) |
| Prompt Cache Policy & TTL | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) | Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost) |
| Computer Use / GUI Agent | Text-only completion (No GUI action loop) | Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops) |
| MCP & Parallel Tool Calling | Prompt-based JSON extraction only | Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema |
| Web Search Grounding & Sandbox | Native Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG | Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools |
| Official Fine-Tuning Support | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) | Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory) |
| Multimodal Token Billing | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) | Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) |
| Quantization & Min GPU VRAM | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 2 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 4 GB VRAM (Native BF16) | BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 1736 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 6020 GB VRAM (Native BF16) |
| Safety & Frontier Classification | OpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published | Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma) |
| Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2) | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control | 100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control |
| Input Modalities | text | text, vision |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
GPT-1 vs Kimi K3: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)
Which is more intelligent, GPT-1 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is more intelligent. It scores 93 compared with 5 on the composite Intelligence Index.
Which model is faster?
GPT-1 is faster, generating 150 tokens per second compared with 58 tokens per second.
Which model has lower latency?
GPT-1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.25s compared with 0.72s.
Which model has a larger context window?
Kimi K3 has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 512 tokens.
Sonuç
Choose GPT-1 for özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal rag mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim api entegrasyonları için idealdir., or choose Kimi K3 for yüksek verimli açık ağırlıklı düşünce zinciri (chain-of-thought) akıl yürütme, kurumsal rag mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim api entegrasyonları için idealdir..
Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)
Which is cheaper: GPT-1 or Kimi K3?+
GPT-1 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens, while Kimi K3 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window: GPT-1 or Kimi K3?+
GPT-1 supports 1K tokens whereas Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens.
Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.
Related reading
- Aion-3.0 vs Aion-Mini: Benchmark, API Fiyatları ve Hız Karşılaştırması (2026)Karşılaştır
- Aion-3.0 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: Benchmark, API Fiyatları ve Hız Karşılaştırması (2026)Karşılaştır
- Aion-Mini vs Laguna XS 2.1: Benchmark, API Fiyatları ve Hız Karşılaştırması (2026)Karşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision: Benchmark, API Fiyatları ve Hız Karşılaştırması (2026)Karşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Command R+: Benchmark, API Fiyatları ve Hız Karşılaştırması (2026)Karşılaştır
- Aya Expanse 8B vs Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct: Benchmark, API Fiyatları ve Hız Karşılaştırması (2026)Karşılaştır
Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.
Resmi kaynaklar: OpenAI & Moonshot AI Official Documentation