Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri

Paylaş

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

GLM-4.6Profile

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Zhipu AI

GLM-4.6

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

Zhipu AI tarafından geliştirilen GLM-4.6; özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 205K bağlam penceresi, 70 token/sn hız, 82/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık eri

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

204.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

48%

Alibaba

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

Alibaba tarafından geliştirilen Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking); özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 131K bağlam penceresi, 95 token/sn hız, 82/100 zeka indeksi ve ücre

Intelligence Index82 / 100

Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

46%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
GLM-4.6 has a larger context window (205K vs 131K tokens).
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is faster at 95 tok/s vs 70 tok/s.
GLM-4.6 leads on SWE-bench coding (48.0% vs 46.0%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	GLM-4.6	Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	82	82
Provider	Zhipu AI	Alibaba
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$0.00 / 1M	$0.00 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	204.8K tokens~307 A4 pages of text	131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	16K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	70 tok/s	95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	48%	46%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	63.5%	68.5%

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

GLM-4.6

+2.0% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Tied

Identical monthly runtime cost

Speed

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

+36% faster generation

Context

GLM-4.6

204.8K tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GLM-4.6Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

48%vs46%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

63.5%vs68.5%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78%vs80%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1320ptsvs1345pts

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs82%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

70 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

GLM-4.60.56s

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)0.54s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

GLM-4.67.70s

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)5.80s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

GLM-4.6 Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Monthly API Bill

$0.00 / month

$0/1M in · $0/1M out

These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

GLM-4.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages

205K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 8K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 48% · GPQA Diamond 63.5%)
Sadece 560 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 70 token yüksek üretim hızı
vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (150B MoE)

Considerations & Trade-offs

Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) · Strengths & Key Advantages

131K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 16K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 46% · GPQA Diamond 68.5%)
Sadece 540 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 95 token yüksek üretim hızı
vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (80B total (3B MoE))

Considerations & Trade-offs

Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	GLM-4.6	Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.00	$0.00
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	18K	20K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	6K	12K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	GLM-4.6	Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Official API Model ID (SDK)	glm-4-6	qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking-instruct
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2025-09	2025-09
Knowledge Cutoff	July 2025	August 2025
Architecture	Advanced Mixture-of-Experts Enterprise Transformer	Deliberate Reasoning Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters	150B MoE	80B total (3B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)	Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)	Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 93 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 323 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 50 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 172 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which model is faster?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 70 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.54s compared with 0.56s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GLM-4.6 has a larger context window, supporting 204.8K tokens compared with 131.1K tokens.

Sonuç

Hem GLM-4.6 (özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) hem de Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) güçlü üretim seçenekleridir: GLM-4.6 karmaşık akıl yürütme ve kodlama testlerinde öne çıkarken, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) daha yüksek üretim hızı sağlar; GLM-4.6 ise yüksek hacimli API kullanımlarında daha ekonomiktir.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Kodlama ve akıl yürütme için GLM-4.6 mi yoksa Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) mi daha iyi?+

Bileşik zeka endeksi ve yazılım testlerinde GLM-4.6 önde yer alıyor. Detaylı karşılaştırma için yukarıdaki SWE-bench ve GPQA tablolarına göz atabilirsiniz.

GLM-4.6 ve Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) API fiyatları nasıl karşılaştırılır?+

GLM-4.6 1M giriş/çıkış tokeni başına $0.00 / $0.00 ücretlendirilirken, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $0.00 / $0.00 seviyesindedir. Karma maliyette GLM-4.6 daha avantajlıdır.

Hangi modelin bağlam penceresi daha geniş ve hızı daha yüksek?+

GLM-4.6 204.8K token bağlam penceresi sunarken Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131.1K token kapasiteye sahiptir. Saniyedeki token üretim hızında ise Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) öndedir.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

GLM-4.6

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

GLM-4.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Teknik Özellikler

GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Sonuç

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Related reading