Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri
Paylaş
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Zhipu AI tarafından geliştirilen GLM-4.5 ve Alibaba tarafından sunulan Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking), kendi sınıflarının öne çıkan yapay zeka modelleridir. GLM-4.5, 131.1K token bağlam penceresi ve 1M token başına $0.00/$0.00 fiyat sunarken; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking), 131.1K token bağlam penceresi ve $0.00/$0.00 fiyatla gelir. Aşağıda tüm benchmark, hız ve maliyet detaylarını inceleyebilirsiniz.

Birebir Karşılaştırma (VS)

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Zhipu AI

GLM-4.5

Açık Ağırlıklı Akıl Yürütme

Zhipu AI tarafından geliştirilen GLM-4.5; yüksek verimli açık ağırlıklı düşünce zinciri (Chain-of-Thought) akıl yürütme için tasarlanmış olup 131K bağlam penceresi, 75 token/sn hız, 80/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık erişimi sunar

Intelligence Index80 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

42%

Alibaba

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

Alibaba tarafından geliştirilen Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking); özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 131K bağlam penceresi, 95 token/sn hız, 82/100 zeka indeksi ve ücre

Intelligence Index82 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

131.1K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

46%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

  • Both models cost the same under this workload — choose on capability, not price.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is faster at 95 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) leads on SWE-bench coding (46.0% vs 42.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGLM-4.5Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
8082
Provider
Zhipu AIAlibaba
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text131.1K tokens~197 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K16K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
75 tok/s95 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
42%46%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
61%68.5%

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
+4.0% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Tied
Identical monthly runtime cost
Speed
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
+27% faster generation
Context
Tied
131.1K tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GLM-4.5Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

42%vs46%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

61%vs68.5%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

75%vs80%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1290ptsvs1345pts
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs82%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

75 tok/s vs95 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GLM-4.50.55s
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)0.54s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GLM-4.57.22s
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)5.80s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GLM-4.5 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
These models cost the same under this workload — no savings either way.Break-even

GLM-4.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 131K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 8K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 42% · GPQA Diamond 61%)
  • Sadece 550 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 75 token yüksek üretim hızı
  • vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (130B MoE)
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
  • Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 131K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 16K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 46% · GPQA Diamond 68.5%)
  • Sadece 540 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 95 token yüksek üretim hızı
  • vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (80B total (3B MoE))
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
  • Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGLM-4.5Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.00$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
16K20K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
6K12K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGLM-4.5Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Official API Model ID (SDK)glm-4-5qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking-instruct
API ProtocolOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGIOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-072025-09
Knowledge CutoffMay 2025August 2025
ArchitectureHybrid Reasoning Mixture-of-Experts TransformerDeliberate Reasoning Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Parameters130B MoE80B total (3B active MoE)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed CloudUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)Free across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)Automatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMBF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 81 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 280 GB VRAM (Native BF16)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 50 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 172 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which is more intelligent, GLM-4.5 or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is more intelligent. It scores 82 compared with 80 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is faster, generating 95 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model has lower latency?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.54s compared with 0.55s.

Sonuç

Hem GLM-4.5 (yüksek verimli açık ağırlıklı düşünce zinciri (Chain-of-Thought) akıl yürütme, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) hem de Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) güçlü üretim seçenekleridir: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) karmaşık akıl yürütme ve kodlama testlerinde öne çıkarken, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) daha yüksek üretim hızı sağlar; GLM-4.5 ise yüksek hacimli API kullanımlarında daha ekonomiktir.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Kodlama ve akıl yürütme için GLM-4.5 mi yoksa Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) mi daha iyi?+

Bileşik zeka endeksi ve yazılım testlerinde Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) önde yer alıyor. Detaylı karşılaştırma için yukarıdaki SWE-bench ve GPQA tablolarına göz atabilirsiniz.

GLM-4.5 ve Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) API fiyatları nasıl karşılaştırılır?+

GLM-4.5 1M giriş/çıkış tokeni başına $0.00 / $0.00 ücretlendirilirken, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $0.00 / $0.00 seviyesindedir. Karma maliyette GLM-4.5 daha avantajlıdır.

Hangi modelin bağlam penceresi daha geniş ve hızı daha yüksek?+

GLM-4.5 131.1K token bağlam penceresi sunarken Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131.1K token kapasiteye sahiptir. Saniyedeki token üretim hızında ise Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) öndedir.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Resmi kaynaklar: Zhipu AI ve Alibaba resmi API dokümantasyonu, sistem kartları ve bağımsız benchmark testleri (2026).