Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri
Paylaş
Related topics (4)
GoogleMetaflagshipopen-source

Compare Gemini 3 Pro by Google against Llama 5 by Meta across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Birebir Karşılaştırma (VS)

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 3 Pro

Amiral Gemisi Öncü Model

Google tarafından geliştirilen Gemini 3 Pro; öncü kurumsal akıl yürütme, yazılım geliştirme ve üretim ölçekli AI iş akışları için tasarlanmış olup 2M bağlam penceresi, 118 token/sn hız, 62/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $2/$12 fiyatlan

Intelligence Index62 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$12.00 / 1M

Context Window:

2M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

76.2%

Meta

Llama 5

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

Meta tarafından geliştirilen Llama 5; özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 5M bağlam penceresi, 65 token/sn hız, 94/100 zeka indeksi ve ücretsiz açık ağırlık erişimi s

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.00 / 1M

Context Window:

5M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

  • Llama 5 is 1.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Llama 5 has a larger context window (5M vs 2M tokens).
  • Gemini 3 Pro is faster at 118 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
  • Gemini 3 Pro leads on SWE-bench coding (76.2% vs 74.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 3 ProLlama 5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6294
Provider
GoogleMeta
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$12.00 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$1.74 / 1M$0.00 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
2M tokens~3,000 A4 pages of text5M tokens~7,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
66K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
118 tok/s65 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
76.2%74%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
73.5%84%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.20 / 1M$0.00 / 1M

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Gemini 3 Pro
+2.2% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Llama 5
1.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro
+82% faster generation
Context
Llama 5
5M tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 3 ProLlama 5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

76.2%vs74%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

73.5%vs84%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86.8%vs87%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1384ptsvs1485pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

12.9%vsN/A
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

47.9%vsN/A
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

44.8%vsN/A
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs68%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

92.8%vs88%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

84.6%vsN/A
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

118 tok/s vs65 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 3 Pro1.80s
Llama 50.85s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 3 Pro6.04s
Llama 58.54s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 3 Pro Monthly API Bill
$14.10 / month
$2/1M in · $12/1M out
Llama 5 Monthly API Bill
$0.00 / month
$0/1M in · $0/1M out
Llama 5 saves approximately $14.10 / month (100%) under this workload.1.0x Savings

Gemini 3 Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 2M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 66K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 76.2% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Sadece 1800 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 118 token yüksek üretim hızı
  • İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $2/$12 fiyatlandırma)
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
  • Yüksek hacimli üretim trafiğinde maliyetleri optimize etmek için Prompt Caching ve Batch API kullanımı önerilir

Llama 5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 5M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 128K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 74% · GPQA Diamond 84%)
  • Sadece 850 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 65 token yüksek üretim hızı
  • vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (600B+ total (~40-80B ))
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
  • Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 3 ProLlama 5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$2.40$0.00
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
60K40K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
31K20K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 3 ProLlama 5
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-3-prometa-llama/Llama-5
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-112026-04
Knowledge CutoffJanuary 2025January 2026
ArchitectureSparse Multimodal MoEMixture-of-Experts with recursive self-improvement (~600B total, 40-80B active)
ParametersConfidential600B+ total (~40-80B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFree across full context window (only KV-cache VRAM scales)
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.2/1M with configurable TTLAutomatic prefix KV-caching in vLLM / SGLang (0 cost)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationFull Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 372 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1290 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision, video, audio
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 5: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 5?

Llama 5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 62 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 3 Pro is faster, generating 118 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Llama 5 is cheaper at $0.00 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.74 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Llama 5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.85s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Llama 5 has a larger context window, supporting 5M tokens compared with 2M tokens.

Sonuç

Choose Gemini 3 Pro for öncü kurumsal akıl yürütme, yazılım geliştirme ve üretim ölçekli ai iş akışları, kurumsal rag mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim api entegrasyonları için idealdir., or choose Llama 5 for özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal rag mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim api entegrasyonları için idealdir..

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 5?+

Gemini 3 Pro costs $2/1M input and $12/1M output tokens, while Llama 5 costs $0/1M input and $0/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 3 Pro or Llama 5?+

Gemini 3 Pro supports 2M tokens whereas Llama 5 supports 5M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Resmi kaynaklar: Google & Meta Official Documentation