Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri
Paylaş
Related topics (4)
GoogleOpenAIfastflagship

Compare Gemini 1.5 Flash by Google against GPT-6.1 Sol by OpenAI across real-world coding, reasoning, token economics, and latency.

Birebir Karşılaştırma (VS)

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench

Live comparison: no in-depth editorial review has been published for this pair yet.

Popular Matchups:
Google

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Ultra Hızlı Düşük Gecikme

Google tarafından geliştirilen Gemini 1.5 Flash; ultra düşük gecikmeli gerçek zamanlı sohbet ve yüksek hacimli yönlendirme için tasarlanmış olup 1.0M bağlam penceresi, 180 token/sn hız, 38/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $0.075/$0.3 fiy

Intelligence Index38 / 100
Input Token:

$0.07 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

20%

OpenAI

GPT-6.1 Sol

Amiral Gemisi Öncü Model

OpenAI tarafından geliştirilen GPT-6.1 Sol; öncü kurumsal akıl yürütme, yazılım geliştirme ve üretim ölçekli AI iş akışları için tasarlanmış olup 1M bağlam penceresi, 120 token/sn hız, 94/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $2/$10 fiyatland

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

82.3%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

  • Gemini 1.5 Flash is 29.6x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash is faster at 180 tok/s vs 120 tok/s.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (82.3% vs 20.0%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGemini 1.5 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
3894
Provider
GoogleOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.07 / 1M$2.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.30 / 1M$10.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.06 / 1M$1.47 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
1.05M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
8K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
180 tok/s120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
20%82.3%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
42.1%80.8%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.02 / 1M$0.10 / 1M

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-6.1 Sol
+62.3% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Gemini 1.5 Flash
29.6x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Gemini 1.5 Flash
+50% faster generation
Context
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1.05M tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Gemini 1.5 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

20%vs82.3%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

42.1%vs80.8%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

69.8%vs89.9%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1228ptsvs1519pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs18.1%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

N/Avs63.6%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs54.8%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs79.7%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs93.5%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

82.5%vs91%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

180 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Gemini 1.5 Flash0.32s
GPT-6.1 Sol1.12s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Gemini 1.5 Flash3.10s
GPT-6.1 Sol5.29s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Gemini 1.5 Flash Monthly API Bill
$0.41 / month
$0.075/1M in · $0.3/1M out
GPT-6.1 Sol Monthly API Bill
$12.15 / month
$2/1M in · $10/1M out
Gemini 1.5 Flash saves approximately $11.74 / month (97%) under this workload.29.6x Savings

Gemini 1.5 Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 1.0M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 8K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 20% · GPQA Diamond 42.1%)
  • Sadece 320 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 180 token yüksek üretim hızı
  • İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $0.075/$0.3 fiyatlandırma)
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
  • Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

GPT-6.1 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • 1M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 128K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 82.3% · GPQA Diamond 80.8%)
  • Sadece 1120 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 120 token yüksek üretim hızı
  • İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $2/$10 fiyatlandırma)
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
  • Yüksek hacimli üretim trafiğinde maliyetleri optimize etmek için Prompt Caching ve Batch API kullanımı önerilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGemini 1.5 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.20$2.05
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
24K62K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K36K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGemini 1.5 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)models/gemini-1-5-flashgpt-6-1-sol
API ProtocolGoogle Gemini API (generateContent) + OpenAI-Compatible SDKOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2024-052026-09
Knowledge CutoffMay 2024April 2026
ArchitectureDistilled Sparse MoE MultimodalNear-Astra unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokensFlat rate ($2/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLImplicit + Explicit Context Caching at $0.01875/1M with configurable TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.1/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxBuilt-in Google Search Grounding + Managed Python Code Execution SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportVertex AI Supervised Adapter Tuning & Context DistillationSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile) · Audio (~25–32 tokens/sec) · Video (~258–300 tokens/sec)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationGoogle DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework VerifiedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, vision, audio, videotext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which is more intelligent, Gemini 1.5 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 38 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is faster, generating 180 tokens per second compared with 120 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Gemini 1.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.06 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $1.47 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Gemini 1.5 Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.32s compared with 1.12s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Gemini 1.5 Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 1M tokens.

Sonuç

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash for ultra düşük gecikmeli gerçek zamanlı sohbet ve yüksek hacimli yönlendirme, kurumsal rag mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim api entegrasyonları için idealdir., or choose GPT-6.1 Sol for öncü kurumsal akıl yürütme, yazılım geliştirme ve üretim ölçekli ai iş akışları, kurumsal rag mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim api entegrasyonları için idealdir..

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Which is cheaper: Gemini 1.5 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.075/1M input and $0.3/1M output tokens, while GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/1M input and $10/1M output tokens.

Which model has a larger context window: Gemini 1.5 Flash or GPT-6.1 Sol?+

Gemini 1.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens whereas GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1M tokens.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Resmi kaynaklar: Google & OpenAI Official Documentation