Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Jamba 1.5 Large

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri

Paylaş

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Command R+Profile

Jamba 1.5 LargeProfile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Cohere

Command R+

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

Cohere tarafından geliştirilen Command R+; özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 128K bağlam penceresi, 65 token/sn hız, 48/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $2.5/$10

Intelligence Index48 / 100

Input Token:

$2.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$10.00 / 1M

Context Window:

128K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

41.5%

AI21

Jamba 1.5 Large

Açık Ağırlıklı Temel Model

AI21 tarafından geliştirilen Jamba 1.5 Large; özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği için tasarlanmış olup 256K bağlam penceresi, 82 token/sn hız, 42/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $2/$8

Intelligence Index42 / 100

Input Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$8.00 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

41.2%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

Jamba 1.5 Large is 1.3x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Jamba 1.5 Large has a larger context window (256K vs 128K tokens).
Jamba 1.5 Large is faster at 82 tok/s vs 65 tok/s.
Command R+ leads on SWE-bench coding (41.5% vs 41.2%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Command R+	Jamba 1.5 Large
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	48	42
Provider	Cohere	AI21
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$2.50 / 1M	$2.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$10.00 / 1M	$8.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$2.02 / 1M	$1.55 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	128K tokens~192 A4 pages of text	256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	8K	4K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	65 tok/s	82 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	41.5%	41.2%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	56.5%	51%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.75 / 1M	$0.50 / 1M

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Command R+

+0.3% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Jamba 1.5 Large

1.3x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Jamba 1.5 Large

+26% faster generation

Context

Jamba 1.5 Large

256K tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Command R+Jamba 1.5 Large

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

41.5%vs41.2%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

56.5%vs51%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

78.5%vs70.2%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1300ptsvs1275pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs6.9%

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

36%vs26.5%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs27.2%

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs45%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

66%vs54%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vs75%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

65 tok/s vs82 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Command R+0.58s

Jamba 1.5 Large0.49s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Command R+8.27s

Jamba 1.5 Large6.59s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Command R+ Monthly API Bill

$13.88 / month

$2.5/1M in · $10/1M out

Jamba 1.5 Large Monthly API Bill

$10.95 / month

$2/1M in · $8/1M out

Jamba 1.5 Large saves approximately $2.93 / month (21%) under this workload.1.3x Savings

Command R+ · Strengths & Key Advantages

128K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 8K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 41.5% · GPQA Diamond 56.5%)
Sadece 580 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 65 token yüksek üretim hızı
vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (104B)

Considerations & Trade-offs

Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
Yüksek hacimli üretim trafiğinde maliyetleri optimize etmek için Prompt Caching ve Batch API kullanımı önerilir

Jamba 1.5 Large · Strengths & Key Advantages

256K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 4K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 41.2% · GPQA Diamond 51%)
Sadece 490 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 82 token yüksek üretim hızı
vLLM, SGLang veya Ollama üzerinden yerel GPU sunucularında barındırılabilen açık ağırlıklı mimari (398B (94B ))

Considerations & Trade-offs

Tam hassasiyette yerel GPU çıkarımı için yeterli VRAM kapasitesine sahip donanım altyapısı gerektirir
Yüksek hacimli üretim trafiğinde maliyetleri optimize etmek için Prompt Caching ve Batch API kullanımı önerilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Command R+	Jamba 1.5 Large
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$0.65	$0.48
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	35K	25K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	0K	0K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Command R+	Jamba 1.5 Large
Official API Model ID (SDK)	command-r-plus	jamba-1-5-large
API Protocol	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI	OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date	2024-08	2024-08
Knowledge Cutoff	June 2024	March 2024
Architecture	Enterprise-Grade Dense Transformer	Hybrid SSM-Transformer (Mamba + Transformer MoE)
Parameters	104B	398B (94B active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud	Unlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Flat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 128K window	Flat rate ($2/1M in) across full 256K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	Cached input at $0.75/1M tokens	Cached input at $0.5/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools	Supported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)	Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 64 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 224 GB VRAM (Native BF16)	BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 247 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 856 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)	Open-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control	100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalities	text	text
Output Modalities	text	text

Command R+ vs Jamba 1.5 Large: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which is more intelligent, Command R+ or Jamba 1.5 Large?

Command R+ is more intelligent. It scores 48 compared with 42 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Jamba 1.5 Large is faster, generating 82 tokens per second compared with 65 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Jamba 1.5 Large is cheaper at $1.55 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $2.02 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Jamba 1.5 Large has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.49s compared with 0.58s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Jamba 1.5 Large has a larger context window, supporting 256K tokens compared with 128K tokens.

Sonuç

Hem Command R+ (özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) hem de Jamba 1.5 Large (özel sunucuda kendi kendine barındırma (self-hosting), ince ayar ve tam veri egemenliği, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) güçlü üretim seçenekleridir: Command R+ karmaşık akıl yürütme ve kodlama testlerinde öne çıkarken, Jamba 1.5 Large daha yüksek üretim hızı sağlar; Jamba 1.5 Large ise yüksek hacimli API kullanımlarında daha ekonomiktir.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Kodlama ve akıl yürütme için Command R+ mi yoksa Jamba 1.5 Large mi daha iyi?+

Bileşik zeka endeksi ve yazılım testlerinde Command R+ önde yer alıyor. Detaylı karşılaştırma için yukarıdaki SWE-bench ve GPQA tablolarına göz atabilirsiniz.

Command R+ ve Jamba 1.5 Large API fiyatları nasıl karşılaştırılır?+

Command R+ 1M giriş/çıkış tokeni başına $2.50 / $10.00 ücretlendirilirken, Jamba 1.5 Large $2.00 / $8.00 seviyesindedir. Karma maliyette Jamba 1.5 Large daha avantajlıdır.

Hangi modelin bağlam penceresi daha geniş ve hızı daha yüksek?+

Command R+ 128K token bağlam penceresi sunarken Jamba 1.5 Large 256K token kapasiteye sahiptir. Saniyedeki token üretim hızında ise Jamba 1.5 Large öndedir.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Command R+ vs Jamba 1.5 Large

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Command R+

Jamba 1.5 Large

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Command R+ · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Jamba 1.5 Large · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Teknik Özellikler

Command R+ vs Jamba 1.5 Large: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Sonuç

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Related reading