Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok Build 0.1

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

GetInfoUs araştırma ekibi tarafından incelendiSon inceleme: October 2026Yayın ilkeleri

Paylaş

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Claude Opus 4.6Profile

Grok Build 0.1Profile

Multi-Model Arena Stack:

5-Model Matrix Workbench

Popular Matchups:

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Derin Akıl Yürütme Motoru

Anthropic tarafından geliştirilen Claude Opus 4.6; derin mantıksal akıl yürütme, ileri matematik ve çok adımlı bilimsel analiz için tasarlanmış olup 1M bağlam penceresi, 55 token/sn hız, 65/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $5/$25 fiyatla

Intelligence Index65 / 100

Input Token:

$5.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$25.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

78.4%

xAI

Grok Build 0.1

Kodlama ve Yazılım Lideri

xAI tarafından geliştirilen Grok Build 0.1; otonom yazılım mühendisliği, çoklu dosya kod düzenleme ve ileri düzey hata ayıklama için tasarlanmış olup 256K bağlam penceresi, 120 token/sn hız, 65/100 zeka indeksi ve 1M token başına $1/$2 fiya

Intelligence Index65 / 100

Input Token:

$1.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.00 / 1M

Context Window:

256K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

69.8%

Bir Bakışta Temel Farklar

Grok Build 0.1 is 8.4x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
Claude Opus 4.6 has a larger context window (1M vs 256K tokens).
Grok Build 0.1 is faster at 120 tok/s vs 55 tok/s.
Claude Opus 4.6 leads on SWE-bench coding (78.4% vs 69.8%).

Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →

Feature	Claude Opus 4.6	Grok Build 0.1
Intelligence Index Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)	65	65
Provider	Anthropic	xAI
Input Price Cost per million input tokens	$5.00 / 1M	$1.00 / 1M
Output Price Cost per million output tokens	$25.00 / 1M	$2.00 / 1M
Blended Price Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M	$3.85 / 1M	$0.57 / 1M
Context Window Maximum input + output tokens	1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text	256K tokens~384 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens Per single request	128K	66K
Throughput Speed Tokens generated per second	55 tok/s	120 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified Real-world software engineering	78.4%	69.8%
GPQA Diamond Graduate-level reasoning	76.5%	68.2%
Cached Input Price Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens	$0.50 / 1M	$0.25 / 1M

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

At-a-glance decision framework

Coding

Claude Opus 4.6

+8.6% SWE-bench lead

Cost

Grok Build 0.1

8.4x cheaper monthly runtime

Speed

Grok Build 0.1

+118% faster generation

Context

Claude Opus 4.6

1M tokens window

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Claude Opus 4.6Grok Build 0.1

SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

78.4%vs69.8%

GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

76.5%vs68.2%

MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.2%vs82.5%

LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1395ptsvs1375pts

Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

N/Avs10.5%

Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

51.4%vs46.2%

SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

N/Avs42%

LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

N/Avs68.5%

AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

N/Avs82.1%

Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

N/Avs80.4%

Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

55 tok/s vs120 tok/s

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better

Claude Opus 4.61.90s

Grok Build 0.10.55s

Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time

Claude Opus 4.610.99s

Grok Build 0.14.72s

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

Daily Input Tokens100K / day

10K500K1M

Daily Output Tokens30K / day

5K150K300K

Prompt Cache Hit Ratio50% cached

0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)

Claude Opus 4.6 Monthly API Bill

$30.75 / month

$5/1M in · $25/1M out

Grok Build 0.1 Monthly API Bill

$3.67 / month

$1/1M in · $2/1M out

Grok Build 0.1 saves approximately $27.07 / month (88%) under this workload.8.4x Savings

Claude Opus 4.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages

1M bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 128K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 78.4% · GPQA Diamond 76.5%)
Sadece 1900 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 55 token yüksek üretim hızı
İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $5/$25 fiyatlandırma)

Considerations & Trade-offs

Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
Yüksek hacimli üretim trafiğinde maliyetleri optimize etmek için Prompt Caching ve Batch API kullanımı önerilir

Grok Build 0.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

256K bağlam penceresi ve yanıt başına maksimum 66K çıktı tokenı kapasitesi (SWE-bench Verified 69.8% · GPQA Diamond 68.2%)
Sadece 550 ms ilk token gecikmesi (TTFT) ile saniyede 120 token yüksek üretim hızı
İstem önbellekleme (Prompt Caching), araç çağırma ve yapılandırılmış JSON çıktısını destekleyen rekabetçi API ekonomisi (1M token başına $1/$2 fiyatlandırma)

Considerations & Trade-offs

Kapalı ağırlıklı bulut modelidir; çevrimdışı yerel sunuculara indirilerek çalıştırılamaz
Çok karmaşık akademik ve bilimsel çıkarımlarda üst düzey ağır akıl yürütme modelleri daha derin sonuçlar verebilir

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metric	Claude Opus 4.6	Grok Build 0.1
Cost per Task Estimated USD to finish one task	$5.49	$0.95
Output Tokens / Task Tokens generated per task	72K	42K
Reasoning Tokens / Task Thinking tokens burned per task	37K	18K

Teknik Özellikler

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Feature	Claude Opus 4.6	Grok Build 0.1
Official API Model ID (SDK)	claude-opus-4-6-20260201	grok-build-0-1-latest
API Protocol	Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI	xAI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date	2026-02	2026-04
Knowledge Cutoff	December 2025	January 2026
Architecture	Megacontext Frontier Reasoning Transformer	Code-Specialized Autoregressive Transformer
Parameters	Confidential	Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)	4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM	5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)	Standard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens	Flat rate ($1/1M in) across full 256K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTL	$0.5/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL	Cached input at $0.25/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI Agent	Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)	API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool Calling	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema	Native MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & Sandbox	Native Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors	Real-time Web & X (Twitter) Search Grounding + Code Execution
Official Fine-Tuning Support	Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation	API Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token Billing	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)	Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAM	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)	Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier Classification	Anthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated	xAI Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier	SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalities	text, vision	text, vision
Output Modalities	text	text

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok Build 0.1: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Which model is faster?

Grok Build 0.1 is faster, generating 120 tokens per second compared with 55 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $0.57 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Grok Build 0.1 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.55s compared with 1.90s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.6 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 256K tokens.

Sonuç

Hem Claude Opus 4.6 (derin mantıksal akıl yürütme, ileri matematik ve çok adımlı bilimsel analiz, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) hem de Grok Build 0.1 (otonom yazılım mühendisliği, çoklu dosya kod düzenleme ve ileri düzey hata ayıklama, kurumsal RAG mimarileri ve ölçeklenebilir üretim API entegrasyonları için idealdir.) güçlü üretim seçenekleridir: Claude Opus 4.6 karmaşık akıl yürütme ve kodlama testlerinde öne çıkarken, Grok Build 0.1 daha yüksek üretim hızı sağlar; Grok Build 0.1 ise yüksek hacimli API kullanımlarında daha ekonomiktir.

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Kodlama ve akıl yürütme için Claude Opus 4.6 mi yoksa Grok Build 0.1 mi daha iyi?+

Bileşik zeka endeksi ve yazılım testlerinde Claude Opus 4.6 önde yer alıyor. Detaylı karşılaştırma için yukarıdaki SWE-bench ve GPQA tablolarına göz atabilirsiniz.

Claude Opus 4.6 ve Grok Build 0.1 API fiyatları nasıl karşılaştırılır?+

Claude Opus 4.6 1M giriş/çıkış tokeni başına $5.00 / $25.00 ücretlendirilirken, Grok Build 0.1 $1.00 / $2.00 seviyesindedir. Karma maliyette Grok Build 0.1 daha avantajlıdır.

Hangi modelin bağlam penceresi daha geniş ve hızı daha yüksek?+

Claude Opus 4.6 1M token bağlam penceresi sunarken Grok Build 0.1 256K token kapasiteye sahiptir. Saniyedeki token üretim hızında ise Grok Build 0.1 öndedir.

AI Terminology & Guide

Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Tokens & Pricing Context Window AI Benchmarks Reasoning Models Tool Calling Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok Build 0.1

İstediğiniz Modelleri Seçin ve Karşılaştırın

Claude Opus 4.6

Grok Build 0.1

Hangi Alanda Kim Kazanıyor?

Doğrulanmış Benchmark Puanları

Gecikme Süresi ve Yanıt Hızı

Gerçek Zamanlı Token Maliyet Simülatörü

Claude Opus 4.6 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Grok Build 0.1 · Strengths & Key Advantages

Considerations & Trade-offs

Token Use & Task Economics

Teknik Özellikler

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok Build 0.1: Hızlı Yanıtlar (SSS)

Sonuç

Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (SSS)

Related reading