Head-to-Head Model Comparison

Solar Pro vs Yi-Large

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
Solar Pro vs Yi-Large: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

Solar Pro da Upstage e Yi-Large da 01.AI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O Solar Pro oferece uma janela de contexto de 32.8K tokens a $0.25/$0.25 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Yi-Large oferece 32.8K tokens de contexto a $2.50/$2.50 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
Upstage

Solar Pro

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Solar Pro da Upstage é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 33K, velocidade de 100 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 75/100 e tar

Intelligence Index75 / 100
Input Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.25 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

01.AI

Yi-Large

Modelo de Geração Clássica

O Yi-Large da 01.AI é um modelo de IA projetado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, oferecendo janela de contexto de 33K, velocidade de 75 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 79/100 e tarifa de $2.5/$

Intelligence Index79 / 100
Input Token:

$2.50 / 1M

Output Token:

$2.50 / 1M

Context Window:

32.8K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

N/A

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Solar Pro is 10.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Solar Pro is faster at 100 tok/s vs 75 tok/s.
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureSolar ProYi-Large
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
7579
Provider
Upstage01.AI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.25 / 1M$2.50 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.25 / 1M$2.50 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.09 / 1M$0.93 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text32.8K tokens~49 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
4K4K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
100 tok/s75 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
N/AN/A
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
N/A52%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.03 / 1M$0.25 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding

Evaluations ongoing

Cost
Solar Pro
10.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Solar Pro
+33% faster generation
Context
Tied
32.8K tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

Solar ProYi-Large
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

N/Avs52%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

73.5%vs76.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1260ptsvs1290pts
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

100 tok/s vs75 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
Solar Pro0.38s
Yi-Large0.51s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
Solar Pro5.38s
Yi-Large7.18s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
Solar Pro Monthly API Bill
$0.64 / month
$0.25/1M in · $0.25/1M out
Yi-Large Monthly API Bill
$6.38 / month
$2.5/1M in · $2.5/1M out
Solar Pro saves approximately $5.74 / month (90%) under this workload.10.0x Savings

Solar Pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 33K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (MMLU-Pro 73.5% · Arena Elo 1260)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 100 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 380 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.25/$0.25 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Yi-Large · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 33K com limite máximo de saída de 4K tokens (GPQA Diamond 52% · MMLU-Pro 76.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 75 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 510 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($2.5/$2.5 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricSolar ProYi-Large
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.04$0.15
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
10K14K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
0K0K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureSolar ProYi-Large
Official API Model ID (SDK)solar-proyi-large
API ProtocolUpstage REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)01.AI REST API (OpenAI-Compatible)
Release Date2024-102024-05
Knowledge CutoffJune 2024March 2024
ArchitectureDepth-Upscaled Dense Language TransformerDense Bilingual Foundation Transformer
Parameters22B (Depth-Upscaled)Confidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM5,000 – 15,000 RPM (Production Tier) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.25/1M in) across full 33K windowFlat rate ($2.5/1M in) across full 33K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLCached input at $0.025/1M tokensCached input at $0.25/1M tokens
Computer Use / GUI AgentAPI / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox toolsSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG DistillationAPI Prompt Engineering & RAG Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token)Text BPE (~4 chars/token)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationUpstage Production Safety & Alignment Verified01.AI Production Safety & Alignment Verified
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext

Solar Pro vs Yi-Large: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, Solar Pro or Yi-Large?

Yi-Large is more intelligent. It scores 79 compared with 75 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Solar Pro is faster, generating 100 tokens per second compared with 75 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Solar Pro is cheaper at $0.09 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.93 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Solar Pro has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.51s.

Veredito

Tanto Solar Pro (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Yi-Large (Indicado para assistentes conversacionais, síntese de textos e tarefas corporativas, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Yi-Large lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Solar Pro oferece geração mais rápida e Solar Pro apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, Solar Pro ou Yi-Large?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Yi-Large leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, Solar Pro ou Yi-Large?+

O Solar Pro custa $0.25 / $0.25 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Yi-Large custa $2.50 / $2.50. No custo combinado, Solar Pro é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O Solar Pro suporta 32.8K tokens de contexto contra 32.8K tokens do Yi-Large, enquanto Solar Pro entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da Upstage e 01.AI e benchmarks independentes (2026).