Head-to-Head Model Comparison

o4-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
o4-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

o4-mini da OpenAI e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash da DeepSeek são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O o4-mini oferece uma janela de contexto de 200K tokens a $1.10/$4.40 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o DeepSeek V4.1-Flash oferece 1M tokens de contexto a $0.30/$1.20 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

o4-mini

Motor de Raciocínio Profundo

O o4-mini da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, oferecendo janela de contexto de 200K, velocidade de 105 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 50/100 e t

Intelligence Index50 / 100
Input Token:

$1.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$4.40 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

57.5%

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O DeepSeek V4.1-Flash da DeepSeek é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 110 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 58/10

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is 3.9x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is faster at 110 tok/s vs 105 tok/s.
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash leads on SWE-bench coding (74.2% vs 57.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
Featureo4-miniDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5058
Provider
OpenAIDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$1.10 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$4.40 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.85 / 1M$0.18 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
100K384K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
105 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
57.5%74.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
73%90.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.28 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+16.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
3.9x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+5% faster generation
Context
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

o4-miniDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

57.5%vs74.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

73%vs90.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

83%vs89.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1325ptsvs1455pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

11.2%vs16.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

36%vs31.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

38.5%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

65%vs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

89.5%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

74.5%vs93%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

105 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
o4-mini1.80s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
o4-mini6.56s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
o4-mini Monthly API Bill
$6.02 / month
$1.1/1M in · $4.4/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash saves approximately $4.48 / month (74%) under this workload.3.9x Savings

o4-mini · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 200K com limite máximo de saída de 100K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 57.5% · GPQA Diamond 73%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 105 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1800 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($1.1/$4.4 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 384K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 110 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 460 ms
  • Pesos abertos (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metrico4-miniDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.72$0.27
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
45K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
25K28K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Featureo4-miniDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Official API Model ID (SDK)o4-minideepseek-reasoner
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2025-042026-09
Knowledge CutoffJune 2024June 2026
ArchitectureCompact reasoning transformerCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)
ParametersConfidential763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($1.1/1M in) across full 200K windowFlat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.275/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

o4-mini vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, o4-mini or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is more intelligent. It scores 58 compared with 50 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is faster, generating 110 tokens per second compared with 105 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is cheaper at $0.18 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.85 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.46s compared with 1.80s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto o4-mini (Indicado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: DeepSeek V4.1-Flash lidera em inteligência geral e programação, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash oferece geração mais rápida e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, o4-mini ou DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, o4-mini ou DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

O o4-mini custa $1.10 / $4.40 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o DeepSeek V4.1-Flash custa $0.30 / $1.20. No custo combinado, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O o4-mini suporta 200K tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do DeepSeek V4.1-Flash, enquanto DeepSeek V4.1-Flash entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e DeepSeek e benchmarks independentes (2026).