Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-6 Luna da OpenAI e DeepSeek V4.1-Flash da DeepSeek são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O GPT-6 Luna oferece uma janela de contexto de 272K tokens a $0.10/$0.50 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o DeepSeek V4.1-Flash oferece 1M tokens de contexto a $0.30/$1.20 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-6 Luna

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GPT-6 Luna da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 272K, velocidade de 245 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 67/100 e tarifa de $0.1/

Intelligence Index67 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

272K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

70.5%

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

Modelo Base de Pesos Abertos

O DeepSeek V4.1-Flash da DeepSeek é um modelo de IA projetado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 110 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 58/10

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$0.30 / 1M

Output Token:

$1.20 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

74.2%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • GPT-6 Luna is 2.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 272K tokens).
  • GPT-6 Luna is faster at 245 tok/s vs 110 tok/s.
  • DeepSeek V4.1-Flash leads on SWE-bench coding (74.2% vs 70.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6758
Provider
OpenAIDeepSeek
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$0.30 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.50 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.08 / 1M$0.18 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K384K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
245 tok/s110 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
70.5%74.2%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
73.5%90.9%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.01 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
+3.7% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-6 Luna
2.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6 Luna
+123% faster generation
Context
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

70.5%vs74.2%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

73.5%vs90.9%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86%vs89.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1405ptsvs1455pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13%vs16.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

44%vs31.2%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

41%vs48%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vs73%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

90.2%vs92.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vs93%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

245 tok/s vs110 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-6 Luna0.38s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash0.46s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-6 Luna2.42s
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash5.01s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-6 Luna Monthly API Bill
$0.61 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.5/1M out
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash Monthly API Bill
$1.54 / month
$0.3/1M in · $1.2/1M out
GPT-6 Luna saves approximately $0.92 / month (60%) under this workload.2.5x Savings

GPT-6 Luna · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 272K com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 70.5% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 245 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 380 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.1/$0.5 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 384K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 74.2% · GPQA Diamond 90.9%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 110 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 460 ms
  • Pesos abertos (763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode )) para auto-hospedagem local ou em nuvem privada via vLLM, SGLang ou Ollama
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Requer servidores GPU com memória VRAM adequada para execução local em precisão total
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.13$0.27
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K58K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
21K28K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-6-lunadeepseek-reasoner
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI-Compatible REST / vLLM / SGLang / HuggingFace TGI
Release Date2026-092026-09
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026June 2026
ArchitectureUltra-budget compact reasoning modelCausal Encoder-Decoder (20 enc + 20 dec layers)
ParametersConfidential763B total (8B prefill / 16B decode active)
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPMUnlimited (Hardware-bound on self-hosted GPU) / 10,000 RPM Cloud · Unlimited local throughput / 10M+ TPM Managed Cloud
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 272K windowFlat rate ($0.3/1M in) across full 1000K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.006/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)API / CLI Tool-Use & DOM Agent ready (no raw pixel desktop click loop)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGSupported via external Tavily/Exa Search & E2B/Docker Sandbox tools
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Full Weights SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO & GRPO RL (Unsloth / Axolotl / Llama-Factory)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)BF16 / FP16, FP8 Dynamic, INT4 AWQ / GPTQ, GGUF (Q4_K_M / Q8_0) · 473 GB VRAM (4-bit Quantized) · 1640 GB VRAM (Native BF16)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpen-Weights System Card + Customizable Guardrail Layer (Llama Guard / ShieldGemma)
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier100% Air-Gapped On-Premises / Private VPC · Full HIPAA, GDPR & SOC2 Control
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-6 Luna vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6 Luna or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

GPT-6 Luna is more intelligent. It scores 67 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6 Luna is faster, generating 245 tokens per second compared with 110 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $0.18 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-6 Luna has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 0.46s.

Which model has a larger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 272K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto GPT-6 Luna (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto DeepSeek V4.1-Flash (Indicado para auto-hospedagem em infraestrutura própria, fine-tuning e soberania de dados, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: GPT-6 Luna lidera em inteligência geral e programação, GPT-6 Luna oferece geração mais rápida e GPT-6 Luna apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, GPT-6 Luna ou DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, GPT-6 Luna leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, GPT-6 Luna ou DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?+

O GPT-6 Luna custa $0.10 / $0.50 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o DeepSeek V4.1-Flash custa $0.30 / $1.20. No custo combinado, GPT-6 Luna é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O GPT-6 Luna suporta 272K tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do DeepSeek V4.1-Flash, enquanto GPT-6 Luna entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e DeepSeek e benchmarks independentes (2026).