Head-to-Head Model Comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

GPT-6 Luna da OpenAI e GPT-5.6 Sol da OpenAI são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O GPT-6 Luna oferece uma janela de contexto de 272K tokens a $0.10/$0.50 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o GPT-5.6 Sol oferece 1.05M tokens de contexto a $4.00/$20.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

GPT-6 Luna

Modelo Leve e Econômico

O GPT-6 Luna da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 272K, velocidade de 245 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 67/100 e tarifa de $0.1/

Intelligence Index67 / 100
Input Token:

$0.10 / 1M

Output Token:

$0.50 / 1M

Context Window:

272K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

70.5%

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Sol

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O GPT-5.6 Sol da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1.1M, velocidade de 108 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 89/100 e t

Intelligence Index89 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1.05M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

83.8%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • GPT-6 Luna is 40.0x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • GPT-5.6 Sol has a larger context window (1M vs 272K tokens).
  • GPT-6 Luna is faster at 245 tok/s vs 108 tok/s.
  • GPT-5.6 Sol leads on SWE-bench coding (83.8% vs 70.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
FeatureGPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Sol
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
6789
Provider
OpenAIOpenAI
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$0.50 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$0.08 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
272K tokens~408 A4 pages of text1.05M tokens~1,575 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
128K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
245 tok/s108 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
70.5%83.8%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
73.5%82%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$0.01 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
GPT-5.6 Sol
+13.3% SWE-bench lead
Cost
GPT-6 Luna
40.0x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
GPT-6 Luna
+127% faster generation
Context
GPT-5.6 Sol
1.05M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Sol
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

70.5%vs83.8%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

73.5%vs82%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

86%vs90.8%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1405ptsvs1496pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13%vs17.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

44%vs61%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

41%vs55%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

68%vs80.6%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

90.2%vs95.8%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80%vs89.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

245 tok/s vs108 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
GPT-6 Luna0.38s
GPT-5.6 Sol1.21s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
GPT-6 Luna2.42s
GPT-5.6 Sol5.84s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
GPT-6 Luna Monthly API Bill
$0.61 / month
$0.1/1M in · $0.5/1M out
GPT-5.6 Sol Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
GPT-6 Luna saves approximately $23.99 / month (98%) under this workload.40.0x Savings

GPT-6 Luna · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 272K com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 70.5% · GPQA Diamond 73.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 245 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 380 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($0.1/$0.5 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Em derivações científicas extremas, modelos pesados dedicados exclusivamente ao raciocínio oferecem maior profundidade

GPT-5.6 Sol · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1.1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 83.8% · GPQA Diamond 82%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 108 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1210 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($4/$20 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

MetricGPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Sol
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$0.13$3.30
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
46K64K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
21K38K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

FeatureGPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Sol
Official API Model ID (SDK)gpt-6-lunagpt-5-6-sol
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1OpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1
Release Date2026-092026-07
Knowledge CutoffApril 2026February 2026
ArchitectureUltra-budget compact reasoning modelFrontier unified reasoning model
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($0.1/1M in) across full 272K windowFlat rate ($4/1M in) across full 1050K window
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $0.01/1M (no extra cache-write fee)Automatic prefix caching at $0.4/1M (no extra cache-write fee)
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAG
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card Published
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, GPT-6 Luna or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol is more intelligent. It scores 89 compared with 67 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

GPT-6 Luna is faster, generating 245 tokens per second compared with 108 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $3.08 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-6 Luna has lower latency, with a time to first token of 0.38s compared with 1.21s.

Which model has a larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Sol has a larger context window, supporting 1.05M tokens compared with 272K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto GPT-6 Luna (Indicado para máxima economia por token e alto desempenho em escala de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto GPT-5.6 Sol (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: GPT-5.6 Sol lidera em inteligência geral e programação, GPT-6 Luna oferece geração mais rápida e GPT-6 Luna apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, GPT-6 Luna ou GPT-5.6 Sol?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, GPT-5.6 Sol leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, GPT-6 Luna ou GPT-5.6 Sol?+

O GPT-6 Luna custa $0.10 / $0.50 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o GPT-5.6 Sol custa $4.00 / $20.00. No custo combinado, GPT-6 Luna é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O GPT-6 Luna suporta 272K tokens de contexto contra 1.05M tokens do GPT-5.6 Sol, enquanto GPT-6 Luna entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e OpenAI e benchmarks independentes (2026).