Head-to-Head Model Comparison

o3-pro vs Claude Opus 5.5

Benchmarks, API Token Pricing, Context Window & Speed Comparison

Revisado pela equipe de pesquisa do GetInfoUsÚltima revisão: October 2026Política editorial
Partilhar
Related topics (12)
AI CompareAI BenchmarkToken PricingModel CostModel SpecsSWE-bench CodingModel VersusWhich AI ModelLLM Speed & LatencyReasoning ModelsExtended ThinkingPrompt Caching ROI
o3-pro vs Claude Opus 5.5: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed Comparison

o3-pro da OpenAI e Claude Opus 5.5 da Anthropic são dois modelos de IA de destaque. O o3-pro oferece uma janela de contexto de 200K tokens a $20.00/$80.00 por milhão de tokens, enquanto o Claude Opus 5.5 oferece 1M tokens de contexto a $4.00/$20.00 por milhão de tokens. Veja abaixo a comparação completa de benchmarks, latência e custos.

Comparação Direta (VS)

Troque e Compare Qualquer Modelo

Select any AI models from our verified benchmark database to generate live side-by-side matrices.

Profile
Profile
Multi-Model Arena Stack:
5-Model Matrix Workbench
Popular Matchups:
OpenAI

o3-pro

Motor de Raciocínio Profundo

O o3-pro da OpenAI é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, oferecendo janela de contexto de 200K, velocidade de 30 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 58/100 e tar

Intelligence Index58 / 100
Input Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$80.00 / 1M

Context Window:

200K tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

71.5%

Anthropic

Claude Opus 5.5

Modelo Principal de Fronteira

O Claude Opus 5.5 da Anthropic é um modelo de IA projetado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, oferecendo janela de contexto de 1M, velocidade de 78 tokens/s, índice de inteligência de 94/100

Intelligence Index94 / 100
Input Token:

$4.00 / 1M

Output Token:

$20.00 / 1M

Context Window:

1M tokens

SWE-bench Verified:

84.6%

Principais Diferenças em Resumo

  • Claude Opus 5.5 is 4.5x cheaper for API usage (input + output tokens combined).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window (1M vs 200K tokens).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 is faster at 78 tok/s vs 30 tok/s.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 leads on SWE-bench coding (84.6% vs 71.5%).
Need definitions for token pricing, context, or benchmarks?Explore AI Glossary →
Featureo3-proClaude Opus 5.5
Intelligence Index
Composite reasoning & knowledge score (0-100)
5894
Provider
OpenAIAnthropic
Input Price
Cost per million input tokens
$20.00 / 1M$4.00 / 1M
Output Price
Cost per million output tokens
$80.00 / 1M$20.00 / 1M
Blended Price
Weighted 7:2:1 cache:input:output per 1M
$15.50 / 1M$3.08 / 1M
Context Window
Maximum input + output tokens
200K tokens~300 A4 pages of text1M tokens~1,500 A4 pages of text
Max Output Tokens
Per single request
100K128K
Throughput Speed
Tokens generated per second
30 tok/s78 tok/s
SWE-bench Verified
Real-world software engineering
71.5%84.6%
GPQA Diamond
Graduate-level reasoning
79.5%82.3%
Cached Input Price
Prompt caching discount per 1M tokens
$5.00 / 1M$0.40 / 1M

Quem vence em cada categoria?

At-a-glance decision framework
Coding
Claude Opus 5.5
+13.1% SWE-bench lead
Cost
Claude Opus 5.5
4.5x cheaper monthly runtime
Speed
Claude Opus 5.5
+160% faster generation
Context
Claude Opus 5.5
1M tokens window

Pontuações de Benchmarks Verificadas

Official evaluation metrics verified by independent third-party research labs.

o3-proClaude Opus 5.5
SWE-bench Verified (Autonomous Coding)

Industry benchmark evaluating real-world GitHub issue resolution and multi-file debugging.

71.5%vs84.6%
GPQA Diamond (Doctorate-Level Science & Math)

Challenging questions created by domain experts to test complex PhD-level reasoning.

79.5%vs82.3%
MMLU-Pro (Multi-task Language Understanding)

Hardened reasoning and academic knowledge benchmark with reduced lucky-guess probability.

88.5%vs91.5%
LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo

Crowdsourced human preference evaluation based on blind, head-to-head model battles.

1352ptsvs1507pts
Humanity's Last Exam (Frontier Expert Knowledge)

Extremely difficult, closed-ended questions spanning the frontier of human expert knowledge.

13.6%vs19.8%
Terminal-Bench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use)

Autonomous multi-step tasks executed inside a real command-line terminal environment.

47.5%vs66.4%
SciCode (Scientific Computing)

Research-grade coding problems drawn from real scientific and numerical workloads.

45.5%vs58.7%
LiveCodeBench (Competitive Coding)

Contamination-free competitive programming problems collected continuously over time.

73%vs83.1%
AIME (Advanced Math Competition)

American Invitational Mathematics Examination — multi-step Olympiad-level reasoning.

93%vs95.4%
Long-Context Reasoning

Accuracy when reasoning over very large inputs that fill the model context window.

80.5%vs92.6%
Generation Speed (Throughput)

Tokens emitted per second during active generation streaming.

30 tok/s vs78 tok/s

Latência e Tempo de Resposta

Time to first token (TTFT) and estimated end-to-end response time for a typical 500-token response.

Time to First Token (TTFT)Lower is better
o3-pro5.20s
Claude Opus 5.51.40s
Est. End-to-End Response (500 tokens)TTFT + generation time
o3-pro21.87s
Claude Opus 5.57.81s

Simulador Interativo de Custo de Tokens

Adjust sliders to calculate projected monthly cloud API spending with prompt caching discounts.

100K / day
10K500K1M
30K / day
5K150K300K
50% cached
0% (Cold)50%90% (Warm)
o3-pro Monthly API Bill
$109.50 / month
$20/1M in · $80/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 Monthly API Bill
$24.60 / month
$4/1M in · $20/1M out
Claude Opus 5.5 saves approximately $84.90 / month (78%) under this workload.4.5x Savings

o3-pro · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 200K com limite máximo de saída de 100K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 71.5% · GPQA Diamond 79.5%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 30 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 5200 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($20/$80 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Claude Opus 5.5 · Strengths & Key Advantages

  • Janela de contexto de 1M com limite máximo de saída de 128K tokens (SWE-bench Verified 84.6% · GPQA Diamond 82.3%)
  • Taxa de transferência rápida de 78 tokens/segundo com latência inicial (TTFT) de 1400 ms
  • Economia de API competitiva ($4/$20 por 1M de tokens) com suporte a cache de prompts e saídas JSON estruturadas
Considerations & Trade-offs
  • Modelo proprietário em nuvem; não permite download dos pesos para execução local offline
  • Para alto volume de requisições, recomenda-se ativar o cache de prompts e a Batch API para reduzir custos

Token Use & Task Economics

Estimated cost and token consumption to complete one representative agentic task.

Metrico3-proClaude Opus 5.5
Cost per Task
Estimated USD to finish one task
$11.68$3.85
Output Tokens / Task
Tokens generated per task
58K68K
Reasoning Tokens / Task
Thinking tokens burned per task
38K42K

Especificações Técnicas

Architecture, release timeline, capabilities, and modalities.

Featureo3-proClaude Opus 5.5
Official API Model ID (SDK)o3-proclaude-opus-5-5-20260901
API ProtocolOpenAI Responses API & Chat Completions v1Anthropic Messages API + AWS Bedrock + Vertex AI
Release Date2025-062026-09
Knowledge CutoffJune 2024June 2026
ArchitectureHigh-effort reasoning transformerExtended Autonomous Hybrid Reasoning Transformer
ParametersConfidentialConfidential
Enterprise Rate Limits (RPM / TPM)10,000 – 30,000 RPM (Tier 5 Enterprise) · 800,000 – 2,000,000 TPM4,000 – 10,000 RPM (Tier 4 + Priority Tier) · 4,000,000 – 10,000,000 TPM
Long-Context Tier (>128K/200K)Flat rate ($20/1M in) across full 200K windowStandard rate up to 200K tokens; 2x input/output tier above 200K tokens
Prompt Cache Policy & TTLAutomatic prefix caching at $5/1M (no extra cache-write fee)$0.4/1M cached read (90% off); 5-min default & 1-hour extended TTL
Computer Use / GUI AgentSupported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)Supported (Screen coordinate grounding, browser & desktop GUI action loops)
MCP & Parallel Tool CallingNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON SchemaNative MCP Client/Server ready · Parallel function calling · 100% Strict JSON Schema
Web Search Grounding & SandboxNative Web Search tool + Hosted Code Interpreter & File Search RAGNative Web Search Citations + Code Execution Tool + MCP Connectors
Official Fine-Tuning SupportSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference (DPO) & Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)Custom Model Tuning via Amazon Bedrock & Prompt Distillation
Multimodal Token BillingText BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)Text BPE (~4 chars/token) · Vision (~258–765 tokens per image tile)
Quantization & Min GPU VRAMCloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)Cloud-Hosted Proprietary (FP8 / BF16 Tensor Core Cluster) · Zero Local VRAM Required (100% Serverless Cloud API)
Safety & Frontier ClassificationOpenAI Preparedness Framework Audited & System Card PublishedAnthropic RSP ASL-2 / ASL-3 Constitutional Safety Evaluated
Enterprise Compliance (ZDR/HIPAA/SOC2)SOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise TierSOC2 Type II · GDPR · Zero Data Retention (ZDR) & HIPAA BAA Available on Enterprise Tier
Input Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Output Modalitiestexttext

o3-pro vs Claude Opus 5.5: Respostas Rápidas (FAQ)

Which is more intelligent, o3-pro or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is more intelligent. It scores 94 compared with 58 on the composite Intelligence Index.

Which model is faster?

Claude Opus 5.5 is faster, generating 78 tokens per second compared with 30 tokens per second.

Which model is cheaper to run?

Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper at $3.08 per 1M tokens blended, compared with $15.50 (7:2:1 cache:input:output ratio).

Which model has lower latency?

Claude Opus 5.5 has lower latency, with a time to first token of 1.40s compared with 5.20s.

Which model has a larger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a larger context window, supporting 1M tokens compared with 200K tokens.

Veredito

Tanto o3-pro (Indicado para raciocínio lógico profundo, matemática avançada e análise científica passo a passo, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) quanto Claude Opus 5.5 (Indicado para raciocínio corporativo de fronteira, programação avançada e cargas de produção, arquiteturas RAG corporativas e integração escalável via API.) entregam excelente desempenho: Claude Opus 5.5 lidera em inteligência geral e programação, Claude Opus 5.5 oferece geração mais rápida e Claude Opus 5.5 apresenta o melhor custo-benefício em produção.

Perguntas Frequentes (FAQ)

Qual é melhor para programação e raciocínio, o3-pro ou Claude Opus 5.5?+

Nas avaliações de inteligência e código, Claude Opus 5.5 leva vantagem. Confira os gráficos SWE-bench e GPQA acima para detalhes.

Qual modelo tem a API mais barata, o3-pro ou Claude Opus 5.5?+

O o3-pro custa $20.00 / $80.00 por 1M de tokens (entrada/saída) e o Claude Opus 5.5 custa $4.00 / $20.00. No custo combinado, Claude Opus 5.5 é mais econômico.

Qual modelo possui maior janela de contexto e velocidade?+

O o3-pro suporta 200K tokens de contexto contra 1M tokens do Claude Opus 5.5, enquanto Claude Opus 5.5 entrega maior velocidade de geração.

AI Terminology & Guide
Explore Glossary →

Understand key metrics like context window, token pricing, reasoning mode, and SWE-bench scores in our comprehensive AI glossary.

Benchmark scores, token prices, and rate limits evolve rapidly as AI labs release model updates. Always verify current specifications and pricing on the official provider documentation.

Fontes oficiais: Documentação oficial de API da OpenAI e Anthropic e benchmarks independentes (2026).